Understanding Nuance and Ambivalence in Intergenerational Relationships Through Fiction

Abstract

The term ‘intergenerational relationships’ is widely used in gerontological literature and age-related policies. However, discussions of the term often tell us surprisingly little about what it means or why it matters. We suggest that this is due to a reductivism and instrumentalism in two main discourses within which intergenerational relationships are usually discussed. Firstly, intergenerational relationships are often conceptualised through a binary ‘conflict / solidarity’ lens, reinforcing an entrenched ‘generationalism’ (White, 2013). Secondly, they are predominantly constructed as a problem to be addressed within debates on how to tackle intergenerational segregation. Neither of these discourses provides much room for a more nuanced understanding of how intergenerational relationships are experienced or why they are meaningful. In this paper, we discuss how fictional narratives can introduce imagination and a richer vocabulary into discourses concerning how people of different ages relate to each other. We present findings from reading groups where adults discussed novels depicting themes of older age, intergenerational relationships, and time. In discussing the fictional narratives and characters, participants reflected on the significance and meaning of intergenerational relationships in ways that went beyond dichotomous and instrumentalist discourses. Drawing on the concept of lived ambivalence (Baars, 2014) we argue that fictional representations of intergenerational themes can elicit more meaningful reflections on the complexities and contradictions of relationships across age groups. We conclude that a more nuanced understanding of intergenerational interaction can inform gerontological discourses and policy, but also that gerontological awareness of social challenges concerning age-relations can inform interpretations of fictional narratives.

“Live Gerontology”: Understanding and Representing Aging, Loneliness, and Long-Term Care Through Science and Art

“…For example, how aging is depicted in literary fiction can help uncover social norms and scripts related to growing old, while offering opportunities to reimagine what it means to be old beyond biomedical paradigms ( Chivers, 2020 ; Cole et al, 2010 ). Similarly, research shows that group-based discussions of fiction can humanize notions of intergenerational relationships ( French et al, 2023 ) and prompt deeper explorations of experiences and representations of people living with dementia and their caregivers ( Carney et al, 2023 ). Art-informed interventions and participatory arts programs, like plays, have also gained popularity to address issues such as ageism and stigma ( Ermer et al, 2021 ; Marshall, 2015 ).…”

Writing our Futures Possible: Inspirations from the Dementia Letter Project

“…Researchers interested in imaginations of the future have found that asking people about the future can lead to rather stereotypical or abstract descriptions (Phoenix, Smith, and Sparkes 2007). Arts-based methods have been found to provide at least a partial solution, through their ability to make research more accessible and help researchers to capture thoughts and experiences in novel ways (Carabelli and Lyon 2016;Sools 2020;French, Lovatt, and Wright 2023). Moreover, McKittrick (2021) sees multiplying the ways in which we work with knowledge through creative practice as a method of generating an ever-expansive and productive diaspora of knowledge that refuses a single, fixed position.…”