2008
DOI: 10.1071/sh08031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding oral sex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an Australian sample, three-quarters of the study participants aged 50-59 years, but only about half of those aged 16-19 years, agreed with the statement, 'If two people had oral sex, but not intercourse, you would still consider that they had had sex together'. 15 We found similar differences for men aged 45-64 years compared with those aged 18-29 years. However, possibly due to limited cell size, the differences between those over 64 years and the youngest group were not significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In an Australian sample, three-quarters of the study participants aged 50-59 years, but only about half of those aged 16-19 years, agreed with the statement, 'If two people had oral sex, but not intercourse, you would still consider that they had had sex together'. 15 We found similar differences for men aged 45-64 years compared with those aged 18-29 years. However, possibly due to limited cell size, the differences between those over 64 years and the youngest group were not significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%