1976
DOI: 10.2307/975055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Organizations and Environments: A Comparative Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ce modèle cherche à remplacer les pratiques consensuelles et pluralistes au centre par un nouvel ordre technocratique « rationel » aux accents populistes 48 . La sécurité nationale 49 et les politiques antidéveloppementales 50 remplacent la vieille rhétorique développementaliste et participante jadis prônée comme antidote aux soulèvements dans la périphérie.…”
Section: Le Modèle De La Sécurité Nationaleunclassified
“…Ce modèle cherche à remplacer les pratiques consensuelles et pluralistes au centre par un nouvel ordre technocratique « rationel » aux accents populistes 48 . La sécurité nationale 49 et les politiques antidéveloppementales 50 remplacent la vieille rhétorique développementaliste et participante jadis prônée comme antidote aux soulèvements dans la périphérie.…”
Section: Le Modèle De La Sécurité Nationaleunclassified
“…Several years ago, in the pages of the Public Administration Review, J. Fred Springer (1976), Jong S. Jun (1976), Jorge I. Tapia-Videla (1976), and Jamil E. Jreisat (1979, in separate articles evaluating the status of Comparative Public Administration alluded to the importance of organization theory. According to Jun:…”
Section: Comparative Study Of Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nature is largely shaped by a number of somewhat contradictory functions that public administration has performed for the larger political systems within which it exists. 33 A first major function ascribed to the public bureaucracies in the region has been to serve as an important mechanism for securing some degree of upward social mobility while at the same time providing a major source of patronage for the groups in positions of power. Patronage has a longstanding tradition in the area and it has shown a high degree of resilience against attempts to introduce 'objective' standards of professionalism through the use of merit systems in the public sector.…”
Section: Maximum Institutional: Characterized By;mentioning
confidence: 99%