2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding overconfidence: Theories of intelligence, preferential attention, and distorted self-assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
92
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants differed from colleagues who, prone to overconfidence, avoid challenges that question their competence, that is, a ‘fixed mind-set’ that impedes learning 37. Instead, they demonstrated qualities that contributed to a habit to critically reflect,14 actively seek out challenging situations and expand their role and mandate, that is, they demonstrated a ‘growth mind-set’ 37.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants differed from colleagues who, prone to overconfidence, avoid challenges that question their competence, that is, a ‘fixed mind-set’ that impedes learning 37. Instead, they demonstrated qualities that contributed to a habit to critically reflect,14 actively seek out challenging situations and expand their role and mandate, that is, they demonstrated a ‘growth mind-set’ 37.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research suggests that people with a growth mindset are more likely to seek challenges (e.g., Romero, Master, Paunesku, Dweck, & Gross, 2014;Yeager et al, 2016a) which lends some credence to this hypothesis. Assuming that the effect of mindset on self-selection is lower for participants with higher scholastic aptitude, the effect of selfselection should be especially pronounced for participants with worse results in the GAP test and should be barely present in participants with top results since these participants probably know that their chances of being admitted are high even when they have a fixed mindset (Ehrlinger, Mitchum, & Dweck, 2016). This would in effect lead to a negative relationship between mindset and the GAP test results among participants scoring lowest in the GAP test, which would mask the presumed general positive relationship between growth mindset and the GAP test results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By influencing students' mindsets, one can also affect students' goal orientations (Dweck, 2000), potentially guiding them to pursue goals more conducive to learning. Such interventions have taken a variety of forms, from reading about struggles of famous individuals (Dweck & Leggett, 1988;Hong & Lin-Siegler, 2012;LinSiegler, Ahn, et al, 2016) to reading articles supporting an incremental mindset (Ehrlinger, Mitchum, & Dweck, 2016;Schroder, Moran, Donnellan, & Moser, 2014). Because mindsets are implicit constructs, they can generally be redirected with simple interventions (Schroder et al, 2014), thus helping influence a reduction in negative beliefs about ability and improving student motivation and performance in school (Lin-Siegler, Dweck, & Cohen, 2016).…”
Section: Mindset Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%