2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Participation in Genetic Research Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: The Influences of Ethnicity, Gender, Education, and Age

Abstract: This study examined reasons for participation in a genetic study of risk for multiple sclerosis (MS). Our sample consisted of 101 patients diagnosed with MS who were approached about enrolling in the Multiple Sclerosis Genetic Susceptibility Study. Participants were predominantly Hispanic (80%), female (80%), and well educated (71%), having at least some level of college education. Of these 101 individuals who were approached, 95 agreed to participate and are the focus of this report. Among enrollees, the most… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, their motivation could be explained by the incentive that glaucoma genetic research may represent a salient path in the search for glaucoma cure. However, our findings on the relationship between age and willingness to participate in genomic research differs from the published findings from a genomic study conducted among participants with multiple sclerosis by Cucarro and co workers which showed that younger patients were more likely to participate in the genetic study for multiple sclerosis when the motivation was to find a cure for multiple sclerosis compared to older patients [31]. The impact of physical disability associated with multiple sclerosis for the younger active population may account for this difference in addition to the fact that they are still early in the disease process.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, their motivation could be explained by the incentive that glaucoma genetic research may represent a salient path in the search for glaucoma cure. However, our findings on the relationship between age and willingness to participate in genomic research differs from the published findings from a genomic study conducted among participants with multiple sclerosis by Cucarro and co workers which showed that younger patients were more likely to participate in the genetic study for multiple sclerosis when the motivation was to find a cure for multiple sclerosis compared to older patients [31]. The impact of physical disability associated with multiple sclerosis for the younger active population may account for this difference in addition to the fact that they are still early in the disease process.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These findings were documented in a cross‐sectional study conducted in Saudi Arabia, revealing a significant association between barriers to engaging in genetic research and participants who were younger and less educated 16 . In contrast, numerous other studies did not find a correlation between education and the consent to participate in genetic research 17–20 . This incongruity may be attributed to the diversity of diseases under investigation, variations in geographical locations and populations, coupled with the inherent disparities in educational strata ranging from graduate degrees to collegiate education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…16 In contrast, numerous other studies did not find a correlation between education and the consent to participate in genetic research. [17][18][19][20] This incongruity may be attributed to the diversity of diseases under investigation, variations in geographical locations and populations, coupled with the inherent disparities in educational strata ranging from graduate degrees to collegiate education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this apparent underrepresentation may also be due to other social factors, including limited access to research opportunities, reduced invitations to participate, and specific attitudes towards genetic research, among others. This unbalanced participation biases research findings, limiting their generalizability to disenfranchised populations [ 8 , 9 ]. These challenges to equitable and informed enrollment are further complicated among persons at risk for being ADAD mutation carriers due to a lack of understanding about the causes of AD, understanding of the rationale behind the methodological designs in studies, and the understanding of the nature of genetic risk [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%