69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007 2007
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201401789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Porosity Variations through Simulating Quartz Cementation of Cambrian Sandstones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porosity in Middle Cambrian reservoir rocks is also controlled by mechanical and chemical compaction which is directly related to burial depth and palaeo temperature. In Western Lithuania and the adjacent offshore, the Cambrian succession was buried to depths of 1000-1300 m by the end of Caledonian deformation and was exposed to palaeo temperatures of ~ 55-65 °C (Sliaupa, 2006;Zdanaviciute et al, 2006). During the Hercynian, Cambrian sediments were buried to depths of 1900-2100 m and palaeo temperatures increased to 100°C (Sliaupa et al, 2001;Zadanaviciute and Lazauskiene, 2004).…”
Section: Middle Cambrian Reservoir Rocks In the Central Baltic Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porosity in Middle Cambrian reservoir rocks is also controlled by mechanical and chemical compaction which is directly related to burial depth and palaeo temperature. In Western Lithuania and the adjacent offshore, the Cambrian succession was buried to depths of 1000-1300 m by the end of Caledonian deformation and was exposed to palaeo temperatures of ~ 55-65 °C (Sliaupa, 2006;Zdanaviciute et al, 2006). During the Hercynian, Cambrian sediments were buried to depths of 1900-2100 m and palaeo temperatures increased to 100°C (Sliaupa et al, 2001;Zadanaviciute and Lazauskiene, 2004).…”
Section: Middle Cambrian Reservoir Rocks In the Central Baltic Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, quartz cementation models based on empirical rate laws for porosity loss in terms of physical parameters (such as initial grain size, temperature, and surface area) can also be found in literature (e.g., Canals & Meunier, ; Walderhaug, ; Wangen, , ). Although the preceding mathematical models have been quite successful in the quantitative estimation of reservoir porosity (see ; Bjørkum et al, ; Lander & Walderhaug, ; Marchand et al, ; Sliaupa, ), they do not provide any insights into the evolving microstructures as a result of syntaxial quartz overgrowths. In order to trace the burial history and make accurate future predictions of porosity and permeability, a deep understanding of the underlying microstructural processes is imperative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%