2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding, promoting and predicting sustainable diets: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior applications of the TPB in predicting food consumption behaviour have shown that the TPB components are able to explain from 39 to 50% of the variance in intention and 27-36% of the variance in behaviour [22]. The potential of the TPB as a model for understanding sustainable behaviours was confirmed by a review conducted by Biasini and colleagues [23] which found a wide range of explained variance of intention (7-87%) and behaviour (3-81%). Another review found that the theory accounted for on average 21% of the variance predicted in health-oriented dietary behaviour [24].…”
Section: The Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Prior applications of the TPB in predicting food consumption behaviour have shown that the TPB components are able to explain from 39 to 50% of the variance in intention and 27-36% of the variance in behaviour [22]. The potential of the TPB as a model for understanding sustainable behaviours was confirmed by a review conducted by Biasini and colleagues [23] which found a wide range of explained variance of intention (7-87%) and behaviour (3-81%). Another review found that the theory accounted for on average 21% of the variance predicted in health-oriented dietary behaviour [24].…”
Section: The Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Nevertheless, this study has confirmed that the self-reported measure of behaviour is better predicted than the observed one, in both countries. Lower predictive power is common in studies addressing more objective, rather that self-reported, behaviour [ 23 , 24 , 29 ]. This may be explained by the stronger measurement correspondence when self-reported measures are used; as in the present study, usually the self-reported measure of behaviour is more in line with the measure of intention, whereas the observed measure is not [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations