Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models

Abstract

The quantum measurement problem, to wit, understanding why a unique outcome is obtained in each individual experiment, is currently tackled by solving models. After an introduction we review the many dynamical models proposed over the years for elucidating quantum measurements. The approaches range from standard quantum theory, relying for instance on quantum statistical mechanics or on decoherence, to quantum-classical methods, to consistent histories and to modifications of the theory. Next, a flexible and rather realistic quantum model is introduced, describing the measurement of the z-component of a spin through interaction with a magnetic memory simulated by a Curie-Weiss magnet, including N 1 spins weakly coupled to a phonon bath. Initially prepared in a metastable paramagnetic state, it may transit to its up or down ferromagnetic state, triggered by its coupling with the tested spin, so that its magnetization acts as a pointer. A detailed solution of the dynamical equations is worked out, exhibiting several time scales. Conditions on the parameters of the model are found, which ensure that the process satisfies all the features of ideal measurements. Various imperfections of the measurement are discussed, as well as attempts of incompatible measurements. The first steps consist in the solution of the Hamiltonian dynamics for the spin-apparatus density matrixD(t). Its off-diagonal blocks in a basis selected by the spin-pointer coupling, rapidly decay owing to the many degrees of freedom of the pointer. Recurrences are ruled out either by some randomness of that coupling, or by the interaction with the bath. On a longer time scale, the trend towards equilibrium of the magnet produces a final stateD(t f ) that involves correlations between the system and the indications of the pointer, thus ensuring registration. AlthoughD(t f ) has the form expected for ideal measurements, it only describes a large set of runs. Individual runs are approached by analyzing the final states associated with all possible subensembles of runs, within a specified version of the statistical interpretation. There the difficulty lies in a quantum ambiguity: There exist many incompatible decompositions of the density matrixD(t f ) into a sum of sub-matrices, so that one cannot infer from its sole determination the states that would describe small subsets of runs. This difficulty is overcome by dynamics due to suitable interactions within the apparatus, which produce a special combination of relaxation and decoherence associated with the broken invariance of the pointer. Any subset of runs thus reaches over a brief delay a stable state which satisfies the same hierarchic property as in classical probability theory; the reduction of the state for each individual run follows. Standard quantum statistical mechanics alone appears sufficient to explain the occurrence of a unique answer in each run and the emergence of classicality in a measurement process. Finally, pedagogical exercises are proposed and lessons for future works on m...

Event-based simulation of quantum physics experiments

“…Microscopically, the detection of a particle involves very intricate dynamical processes. 66 In its simplest form, a light detector consists of a material that can be ionized by light. This signal is then amplified, usually electronically, or in the case of a photographic plate by chemical processes.…”

Insolubility Theorems and EPR Argument

“…This paper was prompted by an engaging and provocative talk by Theo Nieuwenhuizen, 20 presenting the model of spin measurements developed by Allahverdyan, Balian and Nieuwenhuizen (2011). At first, I thought this model was an attempt at doing precisely what is precluded by the insolubility results.…”

Time Automorphisms on C*-Algebras

“…Dissipative processes, irreversible phenomena, the decay of unstable particles, the approach to thermodynamic equilibrium or quantum measurement processes are difficult to accommodate within this traditional mathematical framework [1][2][3].…”

“…Many theoretical approaches to these problems consider an "open" system (or subsystem) S coupled to a "reservoir" R, often viewed as a heat bath or as an apparatus for measurement [3,4]. A different physical interpretation with the same mathematical structure is to identify S with a selection of macroscopic degrees of freedom of a large or infinite many-body system S ∪ R, while R corresponds to the large or infinite number of microscopic degrees of freedom.…”