2006
DOI: 10.1002/joc.1435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding rainfall spatial variability in southeast USA at different timescales

Abstract: Abstract:This study seeks to understand the spatial variability of monthly and daily rainfall in Alabama, Georgia, and Florida, USA. Monthly spatial statistics are needed to improve downscaling from climate models producing seasonal rainfall forecasts, and spatial correlation of daily rainfall is needed to inform spatial weather generators used in climate risk analysis. We first determined the historical record length that is stationary followed by an analysis of the monthly spatial characteristics of rainfall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation distances (slope) during the NEM are found to be larger than in the SWM, indicating a higher spatial correlation of rainfall during the NEM. The observation of weaker correlation during the SWM than in the NEM is consistent and analogous to earlier reports that show smaller correlation distances during summer than in winter (Baigorria et al, 2007;Dzotsi et al, 2014;Li et al, 2014). Weak correlation in summer is attributed to the large spatial variability of rainfall due to highly localized and short-lived convective systems (Krajewski et al, 2003;Dzotsi et al, 2014;Li et al, 2014).…”
Section: Spatial Correlationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The correlation distances (slope) during the NEM are found to be larger than in the SWM, indicating a higher spatial correlation of rainfall during the NEM. The observation of weaker correlation during the SWM than in the NEM is consistent and analogous to earlier reports that show smaller correlation distances during summer than in winter (Baigorria et al, 2007;Dzotsi et al, 2014;Li et al, 2014). Weak correlation in summer is attributed to the large spatial variability of rainfall due to highly localized and short-lived convective systems (Krajewski et al, 2003;Dzotsi et al, 2014;Li et al, 2014).…”
Section: Spatial Correlationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…winter half-year (here, the percentiles for the definition of the extremes also have been separately calculated). Similar to the spatial correlation of precipitation (Baigorria et al, 2007), f usually is smaller in summer than in winter, owing to the greater importance of local convective (heavy) precipitation in mid-latitude summer compared to winter, when (heavy) precipitation is more often triggered by synoptic-scale cyclones and their attendant frontal systems. An interesting difference between extreme precipitation and windstorm events is obvious from Figures 2 and 3.…”
Section: Coherency Of Meteorological Extremesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, the passage of frontal systems also contributes to SE US summer rainfall (Kunkel et al 2012). Differences in the factors that control rainfall in different subregions of the SE US make the summer rainfall highly heterogeneous (e.g., Stooksbury and Michaels 1991;Baigorria et al 2007;Li et al 2013a). These spatially heterogeneous features cannot be well represented by GCMs due to their coarse resolution and oversimplified physics (Taylor et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%