2023
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.22-05-0097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Randomness on a Molecular Level: A Diagnostic Tool

Abstract: This article presents and analyzes a newly developed diagnostic tool—the Molecular Randomness Concept Inventory—to assess undergraduate students’ understanding of randomness at the molecular level. Results from an undergraduate classroom study and think-aloud interviews revealed valid and reliable estimations of students’ conceptual understanding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A story has a good reason if it depends on history, culture, personal character, and biography since life is a set of Stories. Narrative theorists assert that people find stories believable when they act as we do or as we would like to see ourselves acting (Tobler et al, 2022). The narrative paradigm has been studied in rhetoric, literary theory, philosophy, history, psychology, political communication, journalism, folklore, persuasion theory, media, rhetorical, and political communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A story has a good reason if it depends on history, culture, personal character, and biography since life is a set of Stories. Narrative theorists assert that people find stories believable when they act as we do or as we would like to see ourselves acting (Tobler et al, 2022). The narrative paradigm has been studied in rhetoric, literary theory, philosophy, history, psychology, political communication, journalism, folklore, persuasion theory, media, rhetorical, and political communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal research using the Molecular Concepts Adaptive Assessment (n = 1170) suggests that over 70% of first-through third-year undergraduates cannot identify random collisions as the primary mechanism of motion of a molecule toward a binding partner [27]. This finding was supported by Tobler et al [1], who found that students believed certain molecules searched actively for interaction partners, and that active processes are necessary for binding partners to find each other. Such misconceptions often remain unaddressed throughout the students' undergraduate careers [26].…”
Section: Misconceptions and Conceptual Changementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Undergraduate molecular biology students bring with them a myriad of scientific misconceptions reinforced by their prior experiences in the world. A particularly problematic misconception is the idea that molecules have some sort of innate agency that guides their interactions in the cell, which conflicts with their post-secondary instruction about how molecular processes emerge due to the random or stochastic motion of all constituent parts [1][2][3][4][5]. It is thought that such misconceptions arise because students lack real-world referents for emergent processes, as they often occur at a spatial and temporal scales that are not easily observable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the behavior of (a large enough) population is predictable, the behavior of any single actor is not. It is in this context that various assessment instruments ( Garvin-Doxas and Klymkowsky, 2008 ; Klymkowsky et al, 2016a ; Champagne-Queloz et al, 2017 ; Tobler et al, 2023 ) can be useful in identifying when students have learned to apply ideas appropriately.…”
Section: The Origins Of Genetic Drift and The Stochastic Nature Of Bi...mentioning
confidence: 99%