2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-00936-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding rat emotional responses to CO2

Abstract: The aim of this review is to summarize evidence regarding rat emotional experiences during carbon dioxide (CO 2) exposure. The studies reviewed show that CO 2 exposure is aversive to rats, and that rats respond to CO 2 exposure with active and passive defense behaviors. Plasma corticosterone and bradycardia increased in rats exposed to CO 2. As with anxiogenic drugs, responses to CO 2 are counteracted by the administration of anxiolytics, SRIs, and SSRI's. Human studies reviewed indicate that, when inhaling CO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(182 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is reasonable to infer that many participants who use CO 2 as a primary euthanasia method are not convinced that this method provides a good death. These results are consistent with the ongoing debate within the scientific community where some authors argue that CO 2 euthanasia causes suffering in rodents 11 and others argue there is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions regarding the method. 10 The current study did not assess if the information used by participants to interpret the animals’ experiences came from their knowledge of the scientific literature, personal experience, or information provided by regulatory bodies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, it is reasonable to infer that many participants who use CO 2 as a primary euthanasia method are not convinced that this method provides a good death. These results are consistent with the ongoing debate within the scientific community where some authors argue that CO 2 euthanasia causes suffering in rodents 11 and others argue there is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions regarding the method. 10 The current study did not assess if the information used by participants to interpret the animals’ experiences came from their knowledge of the scientific literature, personal experience, or information provided by regulatory bodies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, two recently published literature reviews arrived at contrasting conclusions; Turner and colleagues concluded that there was not enough evidence to determine whether CO 2 killing compromises rodent welfare, 10 while Améndola and Weary concluded that CO 2 inhalation induces negative emotions in rats likely corresponding to fear, anxiety, dyspnea, distress, and panic. 11 Conflict also surrounds alternative methods such as inhalant anaesthetics, with some scholars arguing that that use of CO 2 should continue, 12 and others concluding that alternative methods are more humane. 13 15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 inhalation in the chamber is a more stressful method and causes a cascade of pathophysiologic reactions reflected in blood, as well as the unnecessary suffering of animals [ 39 , 40 ]. In the condition of hypoxia after CO 2 inhalation, hypercalcemia can be developed, as a consequence of electrolyte balance failure [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to pCO 2 levels > 600 ppm has been shown to lead to the "sick-building syndrome, " resulting in irritation, fatigue, anxiety, headaches, and poor cognitive performance (22,(24)(25)(26)35) and sleep apnea (36), linked to elevated pCO 2 in blood (10). Exposure to elevated CO 2 also leads to the emotional responses of fear and panic in humans, a behavior that has also been experimentally confirmed in rats (37). Elevated indoor CO 2 concentrations, well in excess of 1,000 ppm CO 2 , are also characteristic of farm animal houses [e.g., (38,39)].…”
Section: (S33-s35)mentioning
confidence: 98%