Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision

Abstract

BackgroundIt is recognised as good practice to use qualitative methods to elicit users' views of internet-delivered health-care interventions during their development. This paper seeks to illustrate the advantages of combining usability testing with 'theoretical modelling', i.e. analyses that relate the findings of qualitative studies during intervention development to social science theory, in order to gain deeper insights into the reasons and context for how people respond to the intervention. This paper illustrates how usability testing may be enriched by theoretical modelling by means of two qualitative studies of users' views of the delivery of information in an internet-delivered intervention to help users decide whether they needed to seek medical care for their cold or flu symptoms.MethodsIn Study 1, 21 participants recruited from a city in southern England were asked to 'think aloud' while viewing draft web-pages presented in paper format. In Study 2, views of our prototype website were elicited, again using think aloud methods, in a sample of 26 participants purposively sampled for diversity in education levels. Both data-sets were analysed by thematic analysis.ResultsStudy 1 revealed that although the information provided by the draft web-pages had many of the intended empowering benefits, users often felt overwhelmed by the quantity of information. Relating these findings to theory and research on factors influencing preferences for information-seeking we hypothesised that to meet the needs of different users (especially those with lower literacy levels) our website should be designed to provide only essential personalised advice, but with options to access further information. Study 2 showed that our website design did prove accessible to users with different literacy levels. However, some users seemed to want still greater control over how information was accessed.ConclusionsEducational level need not be an insuperable barrier to appreciating web-based access to detailed health-related information, provided that users feel they can quickly gain access to the specific information they seek.

The Behavioral Intervention Technology Model: An Integrated Conceptual and Technological Framework for eHealth and mHealth Interventions

“…For example, some users may prefer more elaborate content, while others may prefer leaner content [20]. Or, for logging features, some users prefer the control and specificity afforded by free text entry, while others prefer the simplicity of drop-down menus.…”

Applying the Behavioural Intervention Technologies model to the development of a smartphone application (app) supporting young peoples’ adherence to anaphylaxis action plan

“…The user-based design study25 aimed to determine: (A) if the proposed aims of the app address barriers for young peoples’ adherence to AAP and respond to young peoples’ needs for support to effectively manage emergency situations, (B) if the proposed elements of the app are feasible and acceptable for users, (C) what technical characteristics of the app are preferred by users.…”

Use of Quick Response (QR) coded bracelets and cards for the improvement of cortisol deficiency/Addison’s disease management: an audit of quality of care of the management of steroid deficiency in acute illness

“…Even a low educational level of patients need not be a barrier to the appreciation of health information on the web if they can quickly obtain the information they need 22. The ADIS system can be brought to the attention of health professionals in the emergency department by unwell patients with Addison’s disease or their friends and relatives so they are empowered to receive the correct treatment in a timely manner.…”