2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding reading as a form of language-use: A language game hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies show that reading performance becomes more structured with higher determinism as reading skill increases (Wijnants et al, 2009 , 2012 ; Wallot et al, 2012 ), and determinism is higher in more fluent readers (O'Brien et al, 2014 ; Wallot et al, 2014 ). It has been suggested that measures of temporal structure of reading times, such as RQA %Determinism, capture how well readers utilize the informational structure of a text, and conversely, how well a texts constrains the reading process toward efficient and fluent reading (Wallot, 2015 , 2016 ). Hence, high degrees of %Determinism should be positively correlated with aspects of reader skill.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies show that reading performance becomes more structured with higher determinism as reading skill increases (Wijnants et al, 2009 , 2012 ; Wallot et al, 2012 ), and determinism is higher in more fluent readers (O'Brien et al, 2014 ; Wallot et al, 2014 ). It has been suggested that measures of temporal structure of reading times, such as RQA %Determinism, capture how well readers utilize the informational structure of a text, and conversely, how well a texts constrains the reading process toward efficient and fluent reading (Wallot, 2015 , 2016 ). Hence, high degrees of %Determinism should be positively correlated with aspects of reader skill.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laminar flow in reading process measures can be interpreted as an indicator of reading fluency. Hence, measures of temporal structure (i.e., %REC, %DET, ADL, MDL) in time-series of reading performance might be an indicator of reading fluency, particularly effortlessness of the reading process and ease-of-comprehension during reading (Wallot, 2015(Wallot, , 2016.…”
Section: Applications Of Rqa In Reading and Writing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there might be other cases where this is not a good idea. For example, I have proposed (Wallot, 2015(Wallot, , 2016) that recurrence properties can be used to infer how strongly cognitive processes are coupled to linguistic information and that would include correlations between reading times and word frequency, for example. In this case, removing the shared variance between word frequency (and other, similar variables) and reading times would not be sensible.…”
Section: Windowed Rqamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LGH adapts the notion of the language game to reading, specifically interpreting different reading tasks and/or stimulus configurations in analogy to different situations of language-use in which the perceptual-cognitive processes of reading unfold. Accordingly, different reading tasks might be governed by very different “rules” and not by a universal reading process [17]. LGH was formulated to address concerns regarding the problem of meaning in contemporary reading research, but also with regard to mounting evidence that linguistic rules are not universal across different languages and reading tasks (e.g., [18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situational roots entailed by the LGH suggest that measures of cognitive performance should exhibit complexity properties when changes in situation or task occur, which otherwise would be ascribed solely to the cognitive processes themselves [15,17]. They further suggest that so-called “complexity flags” (e.g., changes in fractal properties and indicators of phase-transition outlined in more detail below) are more fundamental basic properties that we might expect from self-organized cognitive architectures [20,41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%