2019
DOI: 10.1002/batt.201900010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Rechargeable Li−O2 Batteries via First‐Principles Computations

Abstract: Driven by the growing demand of energy storage devices, rechargeable LiÀO 2 batteries, especially non-aqueous ones, are considered as one of the most promising technologies due to their ultrahigh energy density. However, there are still many challenges, including poor catalytic activity, low conductivity and solvent degradation, to be overcome before their implementation in practical applications. Over decades, first-principles computations have made great progress and become a power-ful tool to predict key pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During discharge, the catalytic Li 2 O 2 production takes place on the MoO monolayer (oxidized top layer of Mo 3 P) with a DFT‐derived overpotential of 0.06 V. The Li 2 O 2 units can then transfer (via ionic liquid) to agglomerated Li 2 O 2 particles, also confirmed by SEM image shown in Figure 3a–f, (Section 19, Supporting Information), leaving a clean MoO layer behind for further catalysis of the Li 2 O 2 production. [ 79,80,63 ] Our DFT‐derived and experimental discharge overpotentials on Mo 3 P are smaller than the values calculated on the bulk Li 2 O 2 surface (0.33 V on the thermodynamically stable majority facet (0001) and 0.12 V on kink sites), [ 49 ] confirming the viewpoint that discharge takes place via catalytic MoO monolayer. For the charging process on the other hand, there can be two possible contributions: 1) dissolution of Li 2 O 2 from the MoO monolayer, 2) dissolution of Li 2 O 2 from the surface of the agglomerated Li 2 O 2 particles formed during the discharge.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 59%
“…During discharge, the catalytic Li 2 O 2 production takes place on the MoO monolayer (oxidized top layer of Mo 3 P) with a DFT‐derived overpotential of 0.06 V. The Li 2 O 2 units can then transfer (via ionic liquid) to agglomerated Li 2 O 2 particles, also confirmed by SEM image shown in Figure 3a–f, (Section 19, Supporting Information), leaving a clean MoO layer behind for further catalysis of the Li 2 O 2 production. [ 79,80,63 ] Our DFT‐derived and experimental discharge overpotentials on Mo 3 P are smaller than the values calculated on the bulk Li 2 O 2 surface (0.33 V on the thermodynamically stable majority facet (0001) and 0.12 V on kink sites), [ 49 ] confirming the viewpoint that discharge takes place via catalytic MoO monolayer. For the charging process on the other hand, there can be two possible contributions: 1) dissolution of Li 2 O 2 from the MoO monolayer, 2) dissolution of Li 2 O 2 from the surface of the agglomerated Li 2 O 2 particles formed during the discharge.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As for the OER path way (recharge process), the rate limitation step for inverse is the oxidation of Li 2 O 2 . [51,52] From Figure 5c, we find that LiCoO 2 can decrease the ORR overpotential to 0.591 V, which is smaller than that of ORR process with Li 0.6 CoO 2 (0.663 V). The calculated result agrees well with the results showing in Figure 5a,b.…”
Section: Self-boosting Mechanism Of Licoo 2 For Lobsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The OER has a multi‐step pathway containing four‐electron transfer [23] . The traditional reaction equations for OER are summarized as follows [Eqs.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanisms Of Oxygen and Hydrogen Electrocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%