2004
DOI: 10.2202/1949-6605.1351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Retention and College Student Bodies: Differences Between Drop-Outs, Stop-Outs, Opt-Outs, and Transfer-Outs

Abstract: O Nonreturning students are comprised of several student subpopulations including drop-outs, stop-outs, opt-outs, and transfer-outs. All too often these student groups are not differentiated in retention studies. The current study profiles these student subpopulations, each with varied reasons for discontinuing their studies, and examines the implications of these differences for campus retention strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms other research about student persistence behavior (Hoyt & Winn, 2004). Likewise, Hu and Kuh (2002) also noted first-generation students were more likely to be disengaged in intellectual pursuits than were their peers.…”
Section: First-generation Studentssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms other research about student persistence behavior (Hoyt & Winn, 2004). Likewise, Hu and Kuh (2002) also noted first-generation students were more likely to be disengaged in intellectual pursuits than were their peers.…”
Section: First-generation Studentssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Students tend to make departure decisions early in their first year of college, sometimes even in the first 4-6 weeks of the fall semester or earlier (Hoyt & Winn, 2004;Ishitani & Desjardins, 2002;Whiteley, 2002;Woosley, 2003). Firstyear students face the most critical challenges in connecting and integrating with the institution.…”
Section: First-year Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for the other measure of educational attainment indicate that being a transfer student reduces the probability of graduation by 11 percent, supporting the research of Hoyt & Winn (2004) regarding higher drop-out rates. The results also indicate differences in the graduation rates based on the demographic variables, with the older students and female students being more likely to graduate and non-white students less likely to graduate compared to white students.…”
Section: International Journal Of Academic Research In Economics and supporting
confidence: 70%
“…In a series of articles, Hilmer (1997Hilmer ( , 1999Hilmer ( and 2002 addressed the more general issue of whether previous college transfer experience has an impact on the labor market earnings of university graduates. Regarding consistency of performance, Hoyt & Winn (2004) asserts that transfer students are much more likely to drop out and have lower GPAs compared to the traditional students. However, Johnson (2005) argues there is no statistical evidence for a difference in the performance of transfer and regular students as measured by the GPA adjusted for precollege variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some students make decisions in regards to departure early in their first year of studies. These decisions are sometimes made just 4-6 weeks into the fall semester 10 . First year students can face critical and sometimes overwhelming challenges trying to connect and integrate themselves into a university setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%