Background Research regarding international female engineering graduate students tends to be aggregated with that about the experiences of international students in the United States or as the struggles of female engineers in engineering disciplines. Therefore, this study was conducted to understand the unique experiences of international female students in U.S. engineering graduate programs.Purpose/Hypothesis This study examined the theoretical intersections of sustainability and liminality in the experiences of international female graduate students in U.S. engineering programs. The study explored the tensions and challenges faced by international female engineering students in navigating engineering graduate programs.Design/Method Using qualitative detailed interviews and focus groups conducted with 49 participants, I explored the ways international female engineering students understood the tensions they experienced and developed strategies of persistence in responding to their liminal status within the engineering graduate programs.Results Three themes on the practices of sustainability in navigating liminality emerged from the data: constructing inclusion, challenging invisibility, and reengineering professional efficacy. The themes reflect the everyday strategies of survival the students participate in amid the challenging environment of the academic organizations.Conclusions International female engineers in U.S. graduate engineering programs exist in liminal spaces where their identities are continually being challenged. Through reconstructing inclusion, challenging their invisibility, and reengineering professional efficacy, they transform these liminal spaces to their advantage and persist in their struggles with the challenges they experience.Keywords gender; engineering; sustainability
IntroductionRetention of minorities has emerged as a key issue in the field of graduate engineering education. Unlike other disciplines, engineering has always occupied a central position in the debate about recruitment and retention practices, especially for women because of the gendered barriers they face (Tonso, 2006a(Tonso, , 2007. Engineering programs and schools are typically gendered, and their institutional practices are masculine (Bergvall et al., 1994). Ingram and Parker (2002) noted the barriers faced by women in U.S. engineering programs, where women are unable to fit
Journal of Engineering EducationV C 2015 ASEE.