2014
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding river dune splitting through flume experiments and analysis of a dune evolution model

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Forecasts of water level during river floods require accurate predictions of the evolution of river dune dimensions, because the hydraulic roughness of the main channel is largely determined by the bed morphology. River dune dimensions are controlled by processes like merging and splitting of dunes. Particularly the process of dune splitting is still poorly understood and -as a result -not yet included in operational dune evolution models. In the current paper, the process of dune splitting is investi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this simulation, the superimposed bed form has a height of H = 0.009 m at t = 2640 s while it is merging with the dune crest, which represents ∼28% of the dune height (0.032 m). This result is consistent with the results of Warmink et al [] and Reesink and Bridge [] who obtained 21% and 25% ratios, respectively, in their experiment with dunes of comparable dimensions. Warmink et al [] describe the sequence as being a dune splitting but during the process the dune crest merges with the superimposed bed form and does not survive in the form of a smaller bed form.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this simulation, the superimposed bed form has a height of H = 0.009 m at t = 2640 s while it is merging with the dune crest, which represents ∼28% of the dune height (0.032 m). This result is consistent with the results of Warmink et al [] and Reesink and Bridge [] who obtained 21% and 25% ratios, respectively, in their experiment with dunes of comparable dimensions. Warmink et al [] describe the sequence as being a dune splitting but during the process the dune crest merges with the superimposed bed form and does not survive in the form of a smaller bed form.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the flow fields of the host and superimposed forms are known to interact (Fernandez et al, 2006;Reesink et al, 2014b), and these hydrodynamic interactions affect the relation between the heights and scour depths of the superimposed bedforms (e.g. McCabe and Jones, 1977;Bridge, 2007, 2009;Warmink et al, 2014). The sediment transport processes on the leeside of the host bedform will also alter in association with the evolving flow field, causing a spatio-temporal variation in both deposition rate and local sediment bypassing (Jopling, 1961;Allen, 1982;Kostaschuk et al, 2009).…”
Section: Using Form-set Analysis To Constrain 'Variability-dominated'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are formed with different sediment sizes, mostly ranging from medium sand to gravel [4], and show rhythmic patterns caused by the interaction of turbulent flow on the riverbed [5]. The geometry of these dunes is a function of flow velocity, flow depth, and other physical parameters describing occurs from May to August [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%