Understanding social demand for sustainable nature conservation. The case of a protected natural space in South-Eastern Spain

When cultural services and biodiversity matter most: Gaining a deeper insight into badlands ecosystem services preferences

“…Contrary to what is assumed in many local management settings, there is no negative perception of the type of biodiversity characteristic of these ecosystems, in which water is scarce and the vegetation sparse. This result is in line with the positive attitudes of the population towards protected natural areas (Alcon et al, 2019) or semi-arid agroecosystems (Zabala et al, 2021) within the region that is also the object of this study.…”

“…On the other hand, conjoint analysis (Luce & Tukey, 1964) is used to obtain valuations or choices for predefined alternatives in the form of choices, pairwise comparisons, ratings or rankings; this allows one to obtain the preferences of the population for the attributes of a given good and the individual utility of each level of its attributes (Shen et al, 2015). Conjoint analysis has been applied to assess the ES provision in agroecosystems (Zabala et al, 2021), protected natural areas (Alcon et al, 2019), landscapes (Masozera et al, 2013), urban forest (Andrada II et al, 2015), parks (Veitch et al, 2017) and mountains (Schirpke et al, 2019), among others. In the case of badlands, no specific studies on the socio‐economic valuation of their ES, for either of the two SP approaches, appear to exist in the literature.…”

A systematic review of the use of environmental economics in the mining industry

“…[50] Water eco-service assessment and compensation in a coal mining region -A case study in the Mentougou District in Beijing [58] A methodological framework to assess the socio-economic impact of underground quarries: A case study from Belgian Limburg [59] Economic valuation of mining heritage from a recreational approach: Application to the case of El Soplao Cave in Spain (Geosite UR004) [60] Estimation of external effects from the quarrying sector using the hedonic pricing method [61] Externality costs of the coalefuel cycle: The case of Kusile Power Station [62] Life cycle cost estimation and environmental valuation of coal mine tailings management [63] Valuing environmental health for informed policy-making [64] Valuing environmental impacts of mercury emissions from gold mining: Dollar per troy ounce estimates for twelve open-pit, small-scale, and artisanal mining sites [65] An integrated framework to assess impacts on ecosystem services in LCA demonstrated by a case study of mining in Chile [66] Perceived health risk, environmental knowledge, and contingent valuation for improving air quality: New evidence from the Jinchuan mining area in China [67] Changes in ecosystem service benefit in Soma lignite region of Turkey [68] Habitat Equivalency Analysis, a framework for forensic cost evaluation of environmental damage [69] The value artificial lake ecosystems provide to recreational anglers: Implications for management of biodiversity and outdoor recreation [70] Understanding social demand for sustainable nature conservation. The case of a protected natural space in South-Eastern Spain [71] Assessment of the external costs of life cycle of coal: The case study of southwestern China [72] Is Mining an Environmental Disamenity? Evidence from Resource Extraction Site Openings [73] Model for assessing health damage from air pollution in quarrying area e Case study at Tan Uyen quarry, Ho Chi Minh megapolis, Vietnam [74] Scholar was not originally searched since the search target comprises peer-reviewed articles only and not publications such as gray literature, presentations, keynotes, extended abstracts, etc.…”

Mise en œuvre d’un processus de « participation contre-argumentative » dans la gestion et la restauration des milieux fluviaux : retour d’expérience dans une Réserve Naturelle Nationale rhénane

“…Dans les milieux aquatiques et riverains, et plus généralement dans les ENPs, la définition de ces mesures de gestion ou de restauration repose très souvent sur des démarches qui se présentent comme étant « participatives » (Graham et al, 2003 ;Nobre et al, 2017 ;Allen et al, 2019). Cette dimension participative répond à une demande sociétale forte (Cortes-Vazquez, 2020 ;Alcon et al, 2019) et est, depuis les années 1980, de plus en plus présentée comme un élément-clé pour structurer et réussir les stratégies de conservation de la nature. En effet, une littérature importante tend à démontrer que la participation peut permettre d'accroître la cohérence, la pertinence et la légitimité des décisions relatives à l'environnement (Reed, 2008 ;Wyatt et al, 2011 ;Rodriguez-Basalo et al, 2019 ;Allen et al, 2019 ;IPBES, 2019).…”

“…Au-delà de cette place grandissante de la participation dans la littérature scientifique (Lemieux et Scott, 2011 ;Bressane, 2017), la participation occupe également une place croissante dans les discours politiques (Cortes-Vazquez, 2020 ;Alcon et al, 2019) 2018). D'autres encore y voient, dans une perspective plus démystificatrice, un mécanisme permettant à des intérêts dominants de s'exprimer au détriment des autres, à la faveur d'une maîtrise supérieure des procédures de communication et de discussion (Bourdieu, 2014).…”