Understanding social enterprise, social entrepreneurship and the social economy in rural Cambodia

Abstract

Purpose This paper critically assesses Western views on the social economy in contrast to everyday realities in a low-income country, and challenges ethnocentric epistemologies in the discourse of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship that is prevalent in international development. It charts the changing trajectory of the social economy and different influences. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative data is used to explore views of members of social enterprises in Northern Cambodia. Three enterprises with different characteristics were selected. Semi-structured interviews and a group discussion took place in each case, exploring motivation, values, empowerment, participation, equity, innovation and risk appetite. Findings The important roles social enterprises play in rural community development are sometimes at odds with the reasoning of Western development agencies. The social economy in Cambodia is undergoing change with the advancement of capitalist market forces. This suits formal businesses but could exacerbate the exclusion of various community actors. Research limitations/implications Three case studies are in close proximity in Northern Cambodia, and the situated dynamics may not transfer well to other contexts. Some limitations are offset by the selection of different types of social enterprises. Practical implications The study gives insights of value to the designers of programmes or projects to support social enterprise who work within international development agencies and non-government organisations. For academics, it offers critical insight into assumptions about social enterprise that emanate from Western management literature. Originality/value This paper meets the need for close-up inter-disciplinary work on social enterprise development in under-represented contexts.

The role of social entrepreneurship in socio-economic development: a meta-analysis of the nascent field

“…Nevertheless, few scholars examined it from a general perspective. These case studies were conducted in China (Wu et al , 2017), Combodia (Lyne et al , 2018), Cabo Verde (Bernardino et al , 2017), Ecuador (Vera-Marquez et al , 2017), Greece (Trigkas et al , 2016) and Slovakia (Angelidou and Mora, 2019). While Friedman and Desivilya (2010) took a general perspective and argued that social entrepreneurship is an effective strategy for regional development in divided societies if it is coupled with conflict management.…”

Intention towards social entrepreneurship of university students in an emerging economy: the influence of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurship education

“…Currently, the research world has given more attention to social entrepreneurship (SE), an emerging field of entrepreneurship (Haugh, 2007;Lyne et al, 2018). Over recent years, numerous politicians in different countries worldwide have taken account of the impacts of SE on socio-economic development and the implications of SE in these nations (Gandhi and Raina, 2018;Tiwari et al, 2017a).…”

Culture and competitiveness in small-scale Latin-American forestry-based enterprising communities

“…Small-scale forestry-based enterprises have few resources to compete with and they are usually shaped by the local culture (Bliss and Kelly, 2008). Knowing that culture can increase growth suggests that more efficient management of these companies and the achievement of more growth would allow them to generate more employment (Di Gregorio, 2017;Lyne et al, 2018). Finally, the community-based enterprise model (Peredo and Chrisman, 2006) includes elements of social capital that belong to the culture of the territory.…”