2006
DOI: 10.4135/9781446279052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Social Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
168
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Rules could be defined as norms and social conventions, whereas resources are subdivided into two sections -that of allocated resources and non-material resources. In this he is criticised for making structure something that is not what social scientists would conventionally recognize (Layder, 1994). Hay (1995) goes on to claim "no dualism, in fact, ever existed between the concepts that Giddens deploys" (Hay, 1995: 198).…”
Section: Sarasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rules could be defined as norms and social conventions, whereas resources are subdivided into two sections -that of allocated resources and non-material resources. In this he is criticised for making structure something that is not what social scientists would conventionally recognize (Layder, 1994). Hay (1995) goes on to claim "no dualism, in fact, ever existed between the concepts that Giddens deploys" (Hay, 1995: 198).…”
Section: Sarasonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach represents a dualism between agency (individual action) and structure (of society) and a distinction between macro and micro level influences (Layder, 2006), but neglects meso level influences. Organizations are a particular type of social structure and there has long been a call for greater consideration of different levels of influence on organizational phenomena and the interplay between them (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What we need is an approach that can justly claim some deeper understanding as well as more accurate predictions of future developments, and at the same time claim a more modest scope and incorporate more complexity and ambiguity (Virtanen, 2013). Anthropological approaches are particularly relevant at this level of ‗situated activity' (Layder, 2006), where (individual) actors draw from cultural repertoires of meaning to interpret what happens in their environment. This interpretation is -in Dilley's words --the act of creating connections‖, and context then just means -sets of connections construed as relevant to someone‖ (1999, p. 2).…”
Section: Abstract or Fragmented Why Is That?mentioning
confidence: 99%