2021
DOI: 10.1111/grow.12529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding spatial and compositional dynamics of employment centers in urban China: Empirical evidence from Nanjing

Abstract: In contrast to abundant research on population (re)distribution in China, the dynamics of intra-urban employment concentration remain poorly understood. Drawing upon firm-level employment data for 2008 and 2013 at a fine analytic scale, we utilize a two-stage approach involving nonparametric estimating and proximity-based threshold setting, persistence score, location quotients, and shift-share

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 94 publications
(138 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, existing studies can be divided into two main categories: morphological polycentricity and functional polycentricity (Barton, 1978; De Goei et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2019). Morphological polycentricity describes the geospatial distribution characteristics of material elements (Han et al., 2022; Long et al., 2022; Meijers & Burger, 2010; Parr, 2004; Wang et al., 2021); Functional polycentric places more emphasis on the functional links between different centers or the spatial division of labor among the centers (Green, 2007; Liu et al., 2020; Veneri, 2010; Xiao et al., 2021). Proponents of the functional polycentricity generally claim that centers without functional links would not form a polycentric system (Burger & Meijers, 2012; ESPON 1.1.1, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, existing studies can be divided into two main categories: morphological polycentricity and functional polycentricity (Barton, 1978; De Goei et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2019). Morphological polycentricity describes the geospatial distribution characteristics of material elements (Han et al., 2022; Long et al., 2022; Meijers & Burger, 2010; Parr, 2004; Wang et al., 2021); Functional polycentric places more emphasis on the functional links between different centers or the spatial division of labor among the centers (Green, 2007; Liu et al., 2020; Veneri, 2010; Xiao et al., 2021). Proponents of the functional polycentricity generally claim that centers without functional links would not form a polycentric system (Burger & Meijers, 2012; ESPON 1.1.1, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%