2006
DOI: 10.3141/1948-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Statistics in Maintenance Quality Assurance Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original performance standards were then adopted to focus on stormwater drainage assets in local urban areas. The second component was developed by adopting the level-of-service (LOS) method for assessing compliance with the performance standards (Ozbek, de la Garza, & Piñero, 2010; Schmitt, Owusu-Ababio, Weed, & Nordheim, 2006). Determining a LOS for infrastructure assets and maintenance activities includes the inspection of randomly selected sample units (e.g., portion of a face block).…”
Section: Development Of the Participatory Assessment Technique For Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original performance standards were then adopted to focus on stormwater drainage assets in local urban areas. The second component was developed by adopting the level-of-service (LOS) method for assessing compliance with the performance standards (Ozbek, de la Garza, & Piñero, 2010; Schmitt, Owusu-Ababio, Weed, & Nordheim, 2006). Determining a LOS for infrastructure assets and maintenance activities includes the inspection of randomly selected sample units (e.g., portion of a face block).…”
Section: Development Of the Participatory Assessment Technique For Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, this percentage ranges between 5 and 15 of the network. Schmitt et al (2006) suggested that a sample size of 2 -5% of the population is adequate to determine the average condition of a highway network; however, they recommended a sample size of 10-15% for determining the distribution of condition and the percentage of the network below (or above) a given target LOS. Although this approach for determining sample size is relatively simple, it may not be justified statistically.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Individual highway agencies have also developed roadside performance standards as part of their MQA programmes. A survey of 39 highway agencies in the USA and Canada (located in 36 states and 3 Canadian provinces) found that 83% of these agencies have an MQA programme (Adams & Smith, 2006;Schmitt, Owusu-Ababio, Weed, & Nordheim, 2006). In most of these MQA programmes, LOS is used as an overall measure of roadway condition.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%