2018
DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding subgroup differences with general mental ability tests in employment selection: Exploring socio‐cultural factors across inter‐generational groups

Abstract: In employment selection, general mental ability (GMA) tests predict training and job performance but also lead to subgroup differences which in turn can produce adverse impact against minority groups. Although researchers have explored genetic, developmental, and environmental explanations for ethnic group differences, few studies have explored socio‐cultural factors comparing immigrant and non‐immigrant job applicants. Given that many ethnic job applicants may also be immigrants, understanding these factors c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 102 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, English language proficiency and exposure to the English language may contribute to differences in test scores between demographic groups; respondents with less exposure to the English language (i.e., those who were not raised speaking English) should perform better on the game-like test than on a written SJT, which likely requires heavier amounts of reading. Along these lines, Hausdorf and Robie (2018) recently reported that racial/ethnic differences in GMA scores could be meaningfully reduced after controlling for differences in English language fluency, generational status, and other demographic variables. Due to the expected cognitive saturation of both assessments used in this study, we expect that these past findings may generalize to our study.…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, English language proficiency and exposure to the English language may contribute to differences in test scores between demographic groups; respondents with less exposure to the English language (i.e., those who were not raised speaking English) should perform better on the game-like test than on a written SJT, which likely requires heavier amounts of reading. Along these lines, Hausdorf and Robie (2018) recently reported that racial/ethnic differences in GMA scores could be meaningfully reduced after controlling for differences in English language fluency, generational status, and other demographic variables. Due to the expected cognitive saturation of both assessments used in this study, we expect that these past findings may generalize to our study.…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%