2003
DOI: 10.4324/9780203301432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Terrorism in America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
104
3
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
104
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental health issues appeared to be a common feature characterising the lone actors that participants come into contact with on a regular basis. This ostensibly contradicts earlier research that terrorists are not characterised by mental illness and that so-called normal psychology is an almost universal trait (Bakker and de Graaf, 2011), but it is countered by studies that focus on lone actors (Corner and Gill, 2015;Hewitt, 2003). However, it was not clear from current data what expertise informed participants' conclusions: it is a commonplace that behaviour which cannot be understood becomes categorised as irrational, with a small step from there to imputing mental health problems.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mental health issues appeared to be a common feature characterising the lone actors that participants come into contact with on a regular basis. This ostensibly contradicts earlier research that terrorists are not characterised by mental illness and that so-called normal psychology is an almost universal trait (Bakker and de Graaf, 2011), but it is countered by studies that focus on lone actors (Corner and Gill, 2015;Hewitt, 2003). However, it was not clear from current data what expertise informed participants' conclusions: it is a commonplace that behaviour which cannot be understood becomes categorised as irrational, with a small step from there to imputing mental health problems.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…What is not clear from this small study is whether those perceptions have any reliable basis. As mentioned earlier, the literature suggests a higher prevalence of mental health problems among lone wolves than among other terrorists (Hewitt, 2003;Spaiij, 2010Spaiij, , 2012. Future research might usefully explore more fully practitioners' awareness of research in this specific area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While there is still no consensus definition of a far-right extremist (see Michael, 2003), this term has been used to describe a variety of individuals and groups who adhere to White supremacist and anti-government belief systems (Barkun, 1997;Berlet & Vysotsky, 2006;Hewitt, 2003;Hoffman, 1987;Neiwert, 1999;Perliger, 2012;Smith, 1994). 3 We will rely on the ECDB's definition of a far-right extremist, which was 2 Data from ECDB has also been used in previous research to successfully examine issues, such as extremist group dynamics (Freilich, Chermak, & Caspi, 2009), differences between violent and non-violent extremist groups , differences between far-right homicides and "regular" non-extremist homicides (Gruenewald & Pridemore, 2012), lone wolf extremist violence (Gruenewald, Chermak, & Freilich, 2013a;2013b), ideologically motivated victimization (Parkin, Freilich & Chermak, 2015;, and county-level variations in extremist attacks (Chermak & Gruenewald, 2015;Freilich, Adamczyk, Chermak, Boyd, & Parkin, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource mobilization theory places a heavy premium on leadership skills in determining which movements or groups succeed (Zald and Mccarthy, 1987). Stern (2003) concluded that terrorist leaders are fundamental to group success because they decide and justify the message and tactics, provide a sense of identity and purpose, and empower marginal followers (see also Hamm, 1993Hamm, , 2002Hewitt, 2003;Jurgensmeyer, 2000;Ruggiero, 2005;Smith, 1994). Relatedly, current social movement scholarship criticizes earlier approaches that refused to take the ideology of far-right groups seriously and dismissed their beliefs as irrational or unreasoned.…”
Section: Growth Of Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%