2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92185-9_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Test-Time Augmentation

Abstract: Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) is a very powerful heuristic that takes advantage of data augmentation during testing to produce averaged output. Despite the experimental effectiveness of TTA, there is insufficient discussion of its theoretical aspects. In this paper, we aim to give theoretical guarantees for TTA and clarify its behavior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, a systematic approach to analyzing the outliers for correctable errors may improve measurement accuracy. We only explored simple averaging and outlier exclusion prior to averaging; other approaches to averaging could including test‐time augmentation, Bayesian inference and other more complex approaches 18,19 . Finally, there may be ways of improving data acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, a systematic approach to analyzing the outliers for correctable errors may improve measurement accuracy. We only explored simple averaging and outlier exclusion prior to averaging; other approaches to averaging could including test‐time augmentation, Bayesian inference and other more complex approaches 18,19 . Finally, there may be ways of improving data acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We only explored simple averaging and outlier exclusion prior to averaging; other approaches to averaging could including test-time augmentation, Bayesian inference and other more complex approaches. 18,19 Finally, there may be ways of improving data acquisition. Another limitation is the absence of a true ground truth for the volume measurements, which is difficult to obtain since ADPKD kidneys are rarely removed even at the time of transplantation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient-based accuracy, a metric aggregating predictions from multiple images of the same patient to make the final diagnosis, peaked at 60.1%, consistently outperforming image-based accuracy which peaked at 51.0%. This aggregation in patient-based accuracy can be seen as a process similar to test time augmentation [22,23], where predictions from augmented images are combined for the final decision, thereby improving overall accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imbalance between malignant and benign classes poses a significant challenge, potentially diminishing the effectiveness of classification models. We resort to the test-time augmentation (TTA) [37] technique to mitigate the imbalance between classes and achieve a more effective balance. This approach is applied to training, validation, and test sets, focusing on the class of malignant lesions.…”
Section: Experiments and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%