“…Li 2 ZrO 3 (theoretical CO 2 uptake capacity: 0.288 g CO 2 g sorbent –1 ) − and Li 4 SiO 4 (theoretical CO 2 uptake capacity: 0.367 g CO 2 g sorbent –1 ), − suffer from an intrinsically lower capacity because of the presence of tertiary elements in addition to slower kinetics of carbonation and regeneration; the same applies to the structurally similar Na 2 ZrO 3 (theoretical CO 2 uptake capacity: 0.234 g CO 2 g sorbent –1 ) (see section ). , One approach to overcome this limitation is to synthesize materials with a higher fraction of alkali metals, such as Li 6 ZnO 4 , Li 6 CoO 4 , Li 5 SbO 5 , Li 4 WO 5 , Li 6 WO 6 , , LiYO 2 , Li 6 Si 2 O 7 , Li 8 SiO 6 , , Li 6 Zr 2 O 7 , , Li 8 ZrO 6 , − Li 5 AlO 4 , , and Li 5 FeO 4 . , Thermogravimetric studies have shown that these materials generally have relatively high gravimetric CO 2 uptake capacities and in many cases also a high cyclic stability, at least for the small number of cycles tested. An overview of these materials is shown in Table .…”