2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the constraints of finger motor control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference may be due to a difference in the intensity of the tasks studied as both other studies employed finger movement at a low intensity (either tapping on a table or extension movements), while the channels for this study were selected on the basis of 100%MVC extension force tasks. However, they mainly highlight the individual nature of forearm musculature (Maas, Veeger, Dirkjan, & Stegeman, 2018;. These results suggest that caution should be applied when determining extrinsic muscle bellies by anatomical landmarks and palpation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This difference may be due to a difference in the intensity of the tasks studied as both other studies employed finger movement at a low intensity (either tapping on a table or extension movements), while the channels for this study were selected on the basis of 100%MVC extension force tasks. However, they mainly highlight the individual nature of forearm musculature (Maas, Veeger, Dirkjan, & Stegeman, 2018;. These results suggest that caution should be applied when determining extrinsic muscle bellies by anatomical landmarks and palpation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…An average contribution of 0.72 could be achieved for all six muscles for gesture F (Figure 6), suggesting that the motor control required participation of more forearm muscles to conduct a fist. Meanwhile, for gesture O, EIP and EPB made the primary contributions (0.95 and 0.99, respectively), which was in accordance with the inherent physiological mechanism that the contribution of finger motor control varies with the task performance [47]. In addition, the ED muscle, located in the posterior forearm, primarily controls stretching movements of the finger, wrist or elbow [48], which theoretically supports our results for the hand open gesture, as presented in Figure 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although not assessed in the present study, substantial interindividual variation has been reported for the intertendinous connections of FDP [13] and FDS [15]. A large sample size will be needed to assess if specific variations are encountered more frequently like those described for the FDS muscle bellies [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent finger control is limited, which is mediated by neural and musculoskeletal mechanisms [9,10]. Regarding the musculoskeletal mechanisms, several candidates have been described: (i) the complex anatomy of the extrinsic muscles actuating the fingers, such as a muscle compartment arranged in series with multiple distal tendons of the FDS muscle [10,19,20];…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation