2020
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202002354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Design Principles of Advanced Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Battery Cathodes: From Transport Kinetics to Structural Engineering, and Future Perspectives

Abstract: have also greatly aroused the positive exploration of alternative LIB technologies in recent years. [44] In contrast to the flammable organic electrolyte in LIBs, the aqueous one exhibits lower cost, higher safety, and especially the superior ionic conductivity, which is generally two orders of magnitude higher than that of the organic system. [9,10] All those unparalleled advantages would make the aqueous battery technologies to be the promising candidates in the future. [11] Rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion bat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
153
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 298 publications
(493 reference statements)
0
153
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the various cathode may apply, such as manganese‐based, 11–18 vanadium‐based, 19–25 cobalt‐based, 26 and organized materials, 27–32 most of the reported aqueous ZIBs system are based on the conventional Zn 2+ intercalation and the performance of the systems is therefore largely limited by the inferior reaction kinetics. The electrochemical reaction kinetics in ZIBs on the cathode side can be generally described as follows 33 : cation first releases from liquid electrolyte to the electrolyte/cathode interface, then passes through the electrolyte/cathode interface and inserts into host structure, and eventually the ions complete solid‐state diffusion process within the host framework. The first step is dominated by the electrolyte properties, 34 while the last two steps significantly rely on the material properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the various cathode may apply, such as manganese‐based, 11–18 vanadium‐based, 19–25 cobalt‐based, 26 and organized materials, 27–32 most of the reported aqueous ZIBs system are based on the conventional Zn 2+ intercalation and the performance of the systems is therefore largely limited by the inferior reaction kinetics. The electrochemical reaction kinetics in ZIBs on the cathode side can be generally described as follows 33 : cation first releases from liquid electrolyte to the electrolyte/cathode interface, then passes through the electrolyte/cathode interface and inserts into host structure, and eventually the ions complete solid‐state diffusion process within the host framework. The first step is dominated by the electrolyte properties, 34 while the last two steps significantly rely on the material properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure a shows the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the bare Zn||MnO 2 and Zn@ZnSe||MnO 2 full cells at 0.5 mV s −1 with a voltage range of 1.0–1.8 V. The distinct cathodic and anodic peaks stem from the reversible redox reactions between MnO 2 and MnOOH. [ 35 ] Moreover, the voltage polarization of Zn@ZnSe||MnO 2 is smaller than that of bare Zn||MnO 2 , implying improved reversibility due to the presence of the ZnSe protective layer. [ 24,36 ] This low polarization may be caused by the reduced R ct of Zn@ZnSe||MnO 2 (Figure S12, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Zn/SNIPSy1/LCO‐SS battery, based on Zn anode and LCO cathode material displayed an impressive open‐circuit voltage (OCV) of 1.72 V. The value is comparable to that of the conventional liquid electrolyte‐based Zn 2+ /Zn batteries further suggesting that the SNIPSy1‐based solid electrolyte systems owing to their high water content are able to emulate their liquid counterparts in terms of the cell potential (Figure S12, Supporting Information). [ 59 ] The stability of the cell was assessed by observing the extent of self‐discharge at 1.6 V over a 50 h period (Figure 4C). Negligible drop in voltage was noticed over the time period suggesting the cell configuration is stable and suitable for further performance analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%