2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-013-9803-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Dynamic Behaviour of a Tennis Racket under Play Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, it was observed that the vibrational waves in a tennis racket were more rapidly damped when held than when freely suspended (Brody, 1987(Brody, , 1989Hatze, 1976;Hennig, Rosenbaum, & Milani, 1992). Interestingly, it has also been shown that the tighter the grip force, the faster the vibrations will be dampen (Savage, 2006), and that holding a racket induces modal frequency shifts toward lower frequencies with respect to the freely suspended boundary condition (Banwell, Roberts, Halkon, Rothberg, & Mohr, 2014). Although grip force is expected to be highly player-dependent, no investigation has demonstrated how grip force modulation would affect the dynamic behaviour of the racket as a function of its mechanical characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As expected, it was observed that the vibrational waves in a tennis racket were more rapidly damped when held than when freely suspended (Brody, 1987(Brody, , 1989Hatze, 1976;Hennig, Rosenbaum, & Milani, 1992). Interestingly, it has also been shown that the tighter the grip force, the faster the vibrations will be dampen (Savage, 2006), and that holding a racket induces modal frequency shifts toward lower frequencies with respect to the freely suspended boundary condition (Banwell, Roberts, Halkon, Rothberg, & Mohr, 2014). Although grip force is expected to be highly player-dependent, no investigation has demonstrated how grip force modulation would affect the dynamic behaviour of the racket as a function of its mechanical characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Analysing how the presence of the player's hand affects the dynamic behaviour of the tennis racket, Brody (1987Brody ( , 1989 pointed out an increase in the temporal decay rate relative to the freely suspended conditions. Based on spectral investigations, Banwell et al (2014) also identified frequency deviations and damping factor changes up to 1500 Hz. Concerning analyses under actual playing conditions, Hennig et al (1992) indicated that less experienced players seem to generate slightly more frequency deviation in the first bending mode than expert players.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is of primary importance since a correlation between the frequency of the racket's first bending mode, estimated under freely suspended conditions, and the amount of vibration transferred to the forearm following a ball impact has been pointed out (Hennig, 2007;Hennig, Rosenbaum, & Milani, 1992). It follows that stroke-induced vibrations are not determined entirely by the mechanical properties of the racket, but rather that racket vibrations are also dependent on the playing velocity (Rogowski et al, 2015) and the attributes of the player's grip (Banwell, Roberts, Halkon, Rothberg, & Mohr, 2014;Kawazoe & Yoshinari, 2010). This hypothesis is supported by the fact that, despite comparable grip forces, the magnitude of vibration transferred into the hands of skilled tennis players is significantly less than that of recreational players (Hennig, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figures 1a&b show mode shapes for the second string modes of a tennis racket [24]. These mode shapes demonstrate clearly one of LDV's main advantages -the ability to measure from very light structures, in this case the strings.…”
Section: Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometry (Sldv) and Experimental Momentioning
confidence: 90%