Understanding the Economic Impact of an Essential Service: Applying Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing to the Hospital Airway Response Team

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the United States moves toward value-based care metrics, it will become essential for anesthesia groups nationwide to understand the costs of their services. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) estimates the amount of time it takes to perform a clinical activity by dividing complex tasks into process steps and mapping each step and has historically been used to estimate the costs of various health care services. TDABC is a tool that can be adapted for variable staffing models and the volume of service provided. Anesthesia departments often provide staffing for airway response teams (ART). The economic implications of staffing ART have not been well described. We present a TDABC model for ART activation in a tertiary-care center to estimate the cost incurred by an anesthesiology department to staff an ART. METHODS: Pages received by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital ART over a 24-month time period (January 2019 to December 2020) were analyzed and categorized. The local administrative database was queried for the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code used to bill for emergency airway placements. Sessions were held by multiple members of the ART to create process maps for the different types of ART activations. We estimated the staffing costs using the estimated time it took for each type of ART activation as well as the data collected for local ART activations. RESULTS: From the paging records, we analyzed 3368 activations of the ART. During the study period, 1044 airways were billed for with emergency airway CPT code. The average revenue collected per airway was $198.45 (95% CI, $190–$207). For STAT/Emergency airway team activations, process maps and non-STAT airway team activations were created, and third subprocess map was created for performing endotracheal intubation. Using the TDABC, the total staffing costs are estimated to be $218,601 for the 2-year study period. The ART generated $207,181 in revenue during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of ART-activation pages suggests that while the revenue generated may cover the cost of staffing the team during ART activations, it does not cover consumable equipment costs. Additionally, the current fee-for-service model relies on the team being able to perform other clinical duties in addition to covering the airway pager and would be impossible to capture using traditional top-down costing methods. By using TDABC, anesthesia groups can demonstrate how certain services, such as ART, are not fully covered by current reimbursement models and how to negotiate for subsidy agreements. As the transition from traditional fee-for-service payments to value-based care models continues in the United States, improving the understanding and communication of medical care costs will be essential. In the United States, it is common for anesthesia groups to receive direct revenue from hospitals to preserve financial viability, and therefore, knowledge of true cost is essential regardless of payer model.1 With traditional payment models, what ...

Value of improving patient safety: health economic considerations for rapid response systems–a rapid review of the literature and expert round table

“…Stone et al 27 examined a hospital airways response team responding to a limited number of rapid response scenarios in a tertiary US setting comparing the cost of running the team and bills for call-outs to insurers as their key metric. In this setting, the authors concluded that ‘what is billable and non-billable may not reflect either the need for or the cost of providing the service’.…”

A Novel Multidisciplinary Team Activation for Patients with Severe Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Creation of the Code GI Bleed Protocol

“…Finally, we plan on an economic analysis to evaluate the financial benefit of protocol usage versus matched controls. 18 …”

Closing the Knowledge Translation Gap: Health Services Research and Perioperative Medicine—New Horizons for Anesthesiologists

“…In the operating room, this process is rather simple, but for activities such as airway response teams and preoperative clinics, this is a more complicated process. Stone 19 presents a time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) model to estimate the cost incurred by an anesthesiology department. The authors conduct a detailed analysis and conclude (not surprisingly) that anesthesiologists provide hospitals with a service that may be undervalued using traditional top-down costing methods.…”

“…The paper titled "Applying Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing to the Hospital Airway Response Team" is particularly relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic. 19 Much has been written on the acute increase in the workload involving anesthesiologists and, in particular, their paramount role in the airway response teams. As we move more toward value-based care, it is essential for anesthesia practices to understand the costs of their services.…”