2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018jd028830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Effects of Polar Mesospheric Clouds on the Environment of the Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere

Abstract: This study focuses on the effects of polar mesospheric cloud (PMC) formation on the chemical environment of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. Of specific interest is how the dehydration due to mesospheric ice particle formation leads to significant seasonal decreases in the atomic hydrogen near the mesopause at middle to high latitudes. Using a three-dimensional whole atmosphere coupled chemistry/dynamics model, we simulate the effects of this dehydration, and via comparisons with three data sets taken fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the inclusion of SABER H data, MSIS 2.0 provides a more accurate description of hydrogen variability in the MLT than MSISE-00 (see Table 2 and spreadsheet S4) One important aspect of this variability is the reversal from a summer maximum at the mesopause (cf. Siskind et al, 2018) to a winter maximum in the upper thermosphere, commonly referred to as the "winter bulge" (Keating & Prior, 1968). Consistent with the known variability of light species, MSISE-00 does have a winter maximum in the upper thermosphere, but has very little seasonal variation in the MLT region (Qian et al, 2018).…”
Section: Atomic Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the inclusion of SABER H data, MSIS 2.0 provides a more accurate description of hydrogen variability in the MLT than MSISE-00 (see Table 2 and spreadsheet S4) One important aspect of this variability is the reversal from a summer maximum at the mesopause (cf. Siskind et al, 2018) to a winter maximum in the upper thermosphere, commonly referred to as the "winter bulge" (Keating & Prior, 1968). Consistent with the known variability of light species, MSISE-00 does have a winter maximum in the upper thermosphere, but has very little seasonal variation in the MLT region (Qian et al, 2018).…”
Section: Atomic Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate TIME-GCM simulated light species responses to middle atmospheric variability, we compared our modeling results with SABER atomic hydrogen measurements. SABER H has been compared with models by Qian et al (2018) and Siskind et al (2018), with an emphasis on seasonal and solar cycle variability. Here we look at the shorter-term variation in response to several SSW/MC events during the lifetime of SABER, including January 2006, 2009, and 2013 events, as well as January 2014, in which no SSW/MC occurred.…”
Section: Saber H Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics and circulation in the MLT are important for global transport of important trace chemical species (Smith et al, 2011;Kvissel et al, 2012), including transporting NO x and meteor smoke into the winter polar stratosphere, which can affect stratospheric ozone and surface climate (Funke et al, 2017;Garcia et al, 2017), whereas the annual formation and depletion of polar mesospheric clouds (PMCs) at the summertime mesopause has an impact on sensitive chemical processes (Thurairajah et al, 2013;Siskind et al, 2018). Neutral winds in the MLT can also have first-order effects on the impacts of space weather in the ionised atmosphere above (Jackson et al, 2019;Sassi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%