2021
DOI: 10.1080/15555240.2021.1968882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the etiology of workaholism: The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of differences, they were closely interrelated since all these factors reflected demanding organizational conditions. As the authors (Liang and Chu, 2009;Morkevi ci ut_ e et al, 2021) emphasized their considerable importance, in the current study the hypotheses will be tested by examining employee's perceptions of these particular demanding conditions, which are presented and explained below.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regardless of differences, they were closely interrelated since all these factors reflected demanding organizational conditions. As the authors (Liang and Chu, 2009;Morkevi ci ut_ e et al, 2021) emphasized their considerable importance, in the current study the hypotheses will be tested by examining employee's perceptions of these particular demanding conditions, which are presented and explained below.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2016) revealed that some work-related factors could cause or boost work addiction. Literature reviews by Liang and Chu (2009), Morkevičiūtė et al. (2021) brought great clarity to this particular domain.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mainly included personality traits (such as perfectionism, type A personality [ 8 ], extraversion, conscientiousness, intellect/imagination, negative affectivity, global and performance-based self-esteem [ 17 ], self-efficacy, neuroticism [ 18 ], etc.) and organizational variables (organizational climate, such as psychological climate for overwork [ 19 , 20 ], work characteristics, such as workload [ 18 , 21 ], working conditions, such as remote work [ 22 ], etc.). However, some authors (Robinson [ 23 ] probably was one of the most influential ones) noted that social influences and, more specifically, people surrounding an individual may also act as important factors inducing work addiction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work addiction literature has focused on internal factors as the antecedents of this phenomenon, such as perfectionism,11 12 self-esteem13 and neuroticism,14 rather than external forces (eg, work pressure15). A recent meta-analysis concluded that less than 20% of empirical studies on work addiction had external factors as an antecedent in their theoretical model 14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%