2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-020-04868-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Friction Behavior of Niobium Sheets during Forming Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FY,fr, results higher and more irregular for the dry sheet. This confirms the considerations on the variation of the friction coefficient from the results obtained in [27]. The dry sheets show galling; this phenomenon is a type of adhesive wear and it is caused by macroscopic transfer of material between metal surfaces during relative sliding motion.…”
Section: /4supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…FY,fr, results higher and more irregular for the dry sheet. This confirms the considerations on the variation of the friction coefficient from the results obtained in [27]. The dry sheets show galling; this phenomenon is a type of adhesive wear and it is caused by macroscopic transfer of material between metal surfaces during relative sliding motion.…”
Section: /4supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, other studies investigated the surface damages of Nb sheets during forming processes, like grinding marks, inclusions, galling phenomenon, orange peeling, tearing, scratches and wrinkling [25,26]. Precisely in order to better understand the friction behavior of Nb sheets during forming processes, the authors presented the results of an experimental campaign based on wear tests, carried out under different loads and in both dry and lubricated conditions [27]. These two different conditions are hereinafter referred to as "dry" and "lubricated".…”
Section: /1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of these components are influenced by the behaviour of tool and sheet and in particular, by assuming as rigid the tool, by the mechanical properties and the thickness of the sheet. On the other hand, F Y along wall A is influenced strongly by the tool/sheet contact conditions, so it results significantly lower under RB conditions (rolling friction; average value of about 80 N); the other two conditions (sliding friction) not only determine significantly higher force values (in line with the considerations on the friction coefficients reported in [40]; average value of about 350 N), but also show an irregular trend (in line with the results of a similar authors' study on another hard-to form material, i.e. the grade 1 titanium [8]), and both these aspects are more relevant for HT (dry) tests.…”
Section: Forming Forcessupporting
confidence: 77%