2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the impact of eliminating user fees: Utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
251
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
21
251
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies assess payments in relation to the budget share [18,19], while others argue that catastrophic spending should be measured in relation to capacity to pay (i.e. household expenditure net of food spending) [20]. Nonetheless, all measures suggest that when households spend a large proportion of their budget on health care, they often forego other goods and services, which can have negative implications for living standards [21].…”
Section: Catastrophic Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies assess payments in relation to the budget share [18,19], while others argue that catastrophic spending should be measured in relation to capacity to pay (i.e. household expenditure net of food spending) [20]. Nonetheless, all measures suggest that when households spend a large proportion of their budget on health care, they often forego other goods and services, which can have negative implications for living standards [21].…”
Section: Catastrophic Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46] (vii) Older persons may have systematically less access to healthcare than younger age groups. 47,48 Despite their importance, the insights generated thus far are unable to adequately fill the information gaps that have hindered progress in policy action on ageing and health in SSA countries.…”
Section: Policy Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no consensus for what threshold delineates the true burden experienced by these households because a wide range of threshold criteria has been used in other studies. Catastrophic health expenditures have been defined as when direct health expenses exceed 5% to more than 20% of household income (Wyszewianski, 1986), as medical costs in excess of 10%-40% of the ability of a household to pay (Wagstaff and van Doorslaer, 2003), or when direct health care spending exceeds 40% of a household's other expenses, excluding subsistence needs (Xu et al, 2006). For the purpose of this study, we defined catastrophic health expenditure as medical expenses in excess of 10% of disposal income.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%