2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the impact of school tobacco policies on adolescent smoking behaviour: A realist review

Abstract: STPs' impact can be influenced by adequate implementation and embedding them in continuous monitoring and adaptation cycles, so that schools can proactively deal with the cognitive and behavioural responses that lead to suboptimal or adverse outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
2
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
61
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…During this process, we attended to evidence supporting these theory areas alongside contradictory examples and unintended consequences. 44 We discussed areas of uncertainty within the final synthesis with stakeholders, and where helpful we conducted additional searches to refine the synthesis further.…”
Section: Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, we attended to evidence supporting these theory areas alongside contradictory examples and unintended consequences. 44 We discussed areas of uncertainty within the final synthesis with stakeholders, and where helpful we conducted additional searches to refine the synthesis further.…”
Section: Analysis and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staff, however, seemed to experience a lack of means to effectively deal with persistent violators, because they have no real means to support nicotine-dependent adolescents and cannot override negative parental influence. Scholars in earlier studies propagated that schools should be provided complementary means and receive external support to help staff enforce SFSPs ( Hamilton et al , 2003 ; Soteriades et al , 2003 ; Schreuders et al , 2017 ), such as smoking cessation services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the adoption of SFSPs by governments is important ( Rozema et al , 2016 ; Linnansaari et al , 2019 ), such top-down rules only become part of adolescents’ school life if these are consistently enforced by school staff. Consistent enforcement is a crucial requisite for realizing SFSP’s optimum effectiveness on the collective of adolescents ( Wakefield et al , 2000 ; Galanti et al , 2014 ; Schreuders et al , 2017 ), because adolescents may (i) interpret staff’s inconsistent enforcement as a sign that health risks of smoking are not so serious ( Clark et al , 2002 ; Baillie et al , 2007 ), (ii) believe consequences are applied in unfair and biased fashions ( Booth‐Butterfield et al , 2000 ; Gittelsohn et al , 2001 ; Clark et al , 2002 ) and (iii) abuse staff’s leniency in attempts to gradually weaken the rules ( Turner and Gordon, 2004 ). In real life, however, inconsistent enforcement is the rule rather than the exception ( Baillie et al , 2011 ; T. LeĂŁo et al , 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The international evidence regarding the effectiveness of outdoor smoking bans remains equivocal and, in line with another study, an outdoor smoking ban might not always protect adolescents from taking up smoking [ 27 ]. Nevertheless, whether or not school smoking policies are effective, depends on whether: (i) the policy is strictly enforced and sanctioned; (ii) adolescents do not feel the pressure to smoke; and (iii) anti-smoking beliefs are internalized so that non-smoking becomes the generally accepted norm [ 36 ]. All these points are important when interpreting the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, adolescents still saw others smoking during school hours, since most schools in the experimental condition tolerated smoking off the school grounds. As a result, adolescents might have felt pressure to conform to other smoking behavior [ 36 ]. Actual smoking might have shifted to, for example, off the school grounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%