2023
DOI: 10.47536/jcrm.v7i3.729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales

Abstract: This review considers the effect of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales2. Two major conclusions are presented: (1) gas-bubble disease, induced in supersaturated tissue by a behavioural response to acoustic exposure, is a plausible pathologic mechanism for the morbidity and mortality seen in cetaceans associated with sonar exposure and merits further investigation; and (2) current monitoring and mitigation methods for beaked whales are ineffective for detecting these animals and protecting them from adverse so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the quality issues, the PSO reports provided a robust and unequalled dataset for GOM that can be used for ongoing research, assessment, management and regulatory planning. Based on data collected by PSOs during 2002-2015 seismic surveys in the GOM, nearly all species groupings were observed farther away from active versus silent airguns, indicating a potential for avoidance behavior similar to those documented in other studies for seismic surveys [15,31,32,34,35] and other anthropogenic sources [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the quality issues, the PSO reports provided a robust and unequalled dataset for GOM that can be used for ongoing research, assessment, management and regulatory planning. Based on data collected by PSOs during 2002-2015 seismic surveys in the GOM, nearly all species groupings were observed farther away from active versus silent airguns, indicating a potential for avoidance behavior similar to those documented in other studies for seismic surveys [15,31,32,34,35] and other anthropogenic sources [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Unlike the combined mid-frequency group, beaked whales showed no significant difference between CPAs during full power versus silent airgun operations. However, as a group, they have shown particular sensitivity to disturbance [42, 43] and higher frequency auditory sensitivities and vocalizations when compared to the broader mid-frequency group [36,41]. In comparison to all other groups analyzed, beaked whales have the largest mean CPA distance (2,090 m) for all airgun activities combined.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the addition of prey measurements, a consideration of human impacts could provide a more complete explanation for fluctuations in Cuvier's beaked whales in the SCB region. Cuvier's beaked whales have clear behavioral responses to increased anthropogenic noise (Cox et al, 2006;D'Amico et al, 2009;Filadelfo et al, 2009). Cuvier's beaked whales may leave the area and end foraging dives prematurely, suffer injury from ascending to the surface too quickly, or experience tissue damage when exposed to loud, anthropogenic sounds such as Mid-Frequency Active Sonar (MFAS) (Cox et al, 2006).…”
Section: Additional Considerations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuvier's beaked whales have clear behavioral responses to increased anthropogenic noise (Cox et al, 2006;D'Amico et al, 2009;Filadelfo et al, 2009). Cuvier's beaked whales may leave the area and end foraging dives prematurely, suffer injury from ascending to the surface too quickly, or experience tissue damage when exposed to loud, anthropogenic sounds such as Mid-Frequency Active Sonar (MFAS) (Cox et al, 2006). With both sites within the US Navy's Southern California Range Complex, incorporating anthropogenic noise impacts into subsequent analyses could help further explain the variability in presence at these sites.…”
Section: Additional Considerations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation