Understanding the lived experience of lung cancer: a European social media listening study

Abstract

Background Social media platforms are increasingly being used by stakeholders to generate, access, and share health-related information and experiences. Lung cancer is the most common cancer, impacting > 2 million patients globally. This observational study utilized a social listening approach to analyze social media trends and gain insights into stakeholder perceptions of lung cancer. Methods This social media study retrospectively collated data from open access blogs, forums, and social networking sites. Social media posts were collected between June 2019–May 2020 from 14 European countries. Using social media aggregator tools, posts comprising lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer-specific terms were extracted. Manual and automated relevancy algorithms filtered the extracted information to provide the relevant dataset. This contextualized dataset was further mined to generate the final data for analysis. Results Of 1360 conversations analyzed, 42% were generated by patients/caregivers and 14% by healthcare professionals (HCPs). A majority of patients were 51–70 years old (approximately 50%) and 91% (n = 500/550) had late-stage cancer. Treatment (35%) and disease awareness (30%) were among the most discussed topic of the patient journey. Although the overall treatment sentiment was neutral, chemotherapy was the treatment type with the highest associated negative sentiment (28%); fewer negative sentiments were associated with immunotherapy (9%) and targeted therapy (2%), due to perceptions of longer survival outcomes and fewer side effects. In conversations that discussed clinical endpoints, “survivability” and “overall survival” (47 and 30%, respectively; n = 539) were most frequently mentioned by stakeholders. HCPs mostly used technical terms, whereas patients and caregivers used colloquial terms such as “getting rid of cancer”. Emotional wellness was identified to have a huge impact on quality of life in lung cancer. Delay or treatment cancellations due to COVID-19, lack of effective treatments and funding, and lack of empathy by physicians emerged as the key unmet needs among patients/caregivers. Conclusions Social listening proved to be an effective tool to explore stakeholders’ perceptions and their key unmet needs, typically not available in published literature or databases, and provides HCPs with valuable insights into the distress, doubts, and needs of lung cancer patients and caregivers.

Perspectives and Experiences of Patients With Thyroid Cancer at a Global Level: Retrospective Descriptive Study of Twitter Data

“…Our findings demonstrate the potential of Twitter as a robust medium for individuals with thyroid cancer to share personal experiences, ranging from diagnosis to therapeutic interventions. Through sharing their experience, patients with thyroid cancer can raise awareness about the difficulties associated with cancer and motivate others who may be confronting similar challenges [ 31 , 32 ]. Moreover, health care providers, media outlets, and health care organizations play a pivotal role in disseminating information, articles, and research findings [ 16 , 19 , 33 ].…”

Patient listening on social media for patient-focused drug development: a synthesis of considerations from patients, industry and regulators

“…In terms of social media sources, the most widely used ones are X/Twitter ( 20 , 42 , 43 ), online forums ( 20 , 36 , 44 ), Facebook or closed networks ( 20 , 45 , 46 ), and patient communities ( 25 , 47 , 48 ). More recently, studies have also started to use Reddit as a data source, e.g., ( 36 , 49 , 50 ).…”

“…From a methodological perspective, SML is an observational, non-interventional method ( 28 , 44 , 59 ) that does not rely on a specific set of questions to be asked to patients, in contrast to more traditional instruments such as interviews, surveys, or focus groups ( 16 ). Because it is not restricted to preformulated questions or structure, SML methods avoid problems related to biases that might be created by asking a question in a specific manner (e.g., leading-question bias).…”

Perception of Online Communities towards the Use of Cancer Immunotherapy: A Data Mining Study of 3.6 Million Web-based Posts from Social Media Platforms Using BERTopic (Preprint)

“…The Internet, therefore, provides a valuable platform for capturing diverse perspectives. Several studies have explored these perspectives by collecting data from social media platforms and forums [9][10][11][12][13]. For example, through analyzing posts from social media, a study revealed that pain and fatigue were the most commonly discussed symptoms among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer regarding the use of immunotherapy [10].…”