2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Mass-Radius Relation for Sub-Neptunes: Radius as a Proxy for Composition

Abstract: Transiting planet surveys like Kepler have provided a wealth of information on the distribution of planetary radii, particularly for the new populations of super-Earth and sub-Neptune sized planets. In order to aid in the physical interpretation of these radii, we compute model radii for low-mass rocky planets with hydrogenhelium envelopes. We provide model radii for planets 1-20 M ⊕ , with envelope fractions from 0.01-20%, levels of irradiation 0.1-1000× Earth's, and ages from 100 Myr to 10 Gyr. In addition w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
929
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 713 publications
(983 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
50
929
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For H/He dominated atmospheric envelopes, R R p p D is roughly equivalent to the relative mass fraction of envelope (Lopez & Fortney 2014). In general, we find that the planets with lower relative envelope fractions are more highly irradiated than the planets with large relative envelope fractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For H/He dominated atmospheric envelopes, R R p p D is roughly equivalent to the relative mass fraction of envelope (Lopez & Fortney 2014). In general, we find that the planets with lower relative envelope fractions are more highly irradiated than the planets with large relative envelope fractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…iron covered by a low density envelope. Employing the models of Lopez & Fortney (2014) and assuming a system age of 5 Gyr, the observed mass and radius of Kepler-454b could be explained if the planet is shrouded by a solar metallicity H/He and a total mass equal to roughly 1% of the total planetary mass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the formation phase, the luminosity resulting from the accretion of planetesimals is anyway usually much bigger than the core's cooling. But it leads to an underestimation of the luminosity of low-mass, core-dominated planets with masses 30M ⊕ during the evolutionary phase at constant mass (Lopez & Fortney 2014). We therefore restrict this work mostly to giant planets where the luminosity is strongly dominated by the cooling of the H/He envelope also during evolution.…”
Section: Thermodynamics Of the Accretion Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the resulting probability distribution, we constrain CMF>0.96 and M core > 10.8 Å M at 99.7% confidence (3σ). One potential limitation of our method is that the Lopez & Fortney (2014) models assume that the planet incident flux is constant. However, the luminosity of K2-66 has increased by a factor of ∼2 since evolving off of the main sequence, and therefore the planet incident flux was twice as low for most of its lifetime.…”
Section: K2-66mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gaseous envelopes of planets at extreme temperatures are subjected to photoevaporation by the incident radiation from their host stars (e.g., Owen & Wu 2013;Lopez & Fortney 2014). Probing planets at extreme temperatures is crucial to understanding these sculpting effects and the formation histories of planets close to their host stars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%