With the emerging demands for clean energy and an economy with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, electrocatalysis areas have attracted tremendous interest in recent years. The electrochemical devices that use electrocatalysis, such as fuel cells, electrolyzers, and flow batteries, consist of hierarchical structures, requiring comprehension and rational designs across scales from millimeter and micrometer all the way down to atomic scale. In past decades, electron microscopy techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have been extensively utilized for imaging different scales of these devices in both two and three dimensions. However, electron-based techniques for high-resolution imaging require uninterrupted maintenance of a high-vacuum environment, leading to difficulties of sample preparation and lack of integrated observation without intrusion/ disassembly. To overcome these disadvantages, more and more efforts have been dedicated to the development of X-ray imaging techniques recently, specifically absorption-based two-dimensional (2D) transmission X-ray microscopy and three-dimensional (3D) X-ray tomography, due to much better transmission behaviors of X-rays than electrons. X-ray tomography imaging mostly focuses on answering questions related to morphology and morphological changes at the microscale or near 1 μm resolution and nanoscale of 30 nm resolution. The method is nondestructive and it allows for the visualization of operando electrochemical devices, such as fuel cells, electrolyzers, and redox flow batteries. Operando X-ray microscopic tomography typically focuses on catalyst layers and morphology changes during degradation, as well as mass transport. Nanoscale tomography still predominantly is used for ex situ studies, as multiple challenges exist for operando studies implementation, including X-ray beam damage, sample holder design, and beamline availability. Both microscale and nanoscale tomography beamlines now couple various spectroscopic techniques, enabling electrocatalysis studies for both morphology and chemical transformations. This viewpoint highlights the recent advances in X-ray tomography for electrocatalysis, compares it to other tomographic techniques, and outlines key complementary techniques that can provide additional information during imaging. Lastly, it provides a perspective of what to anticipate in coming years regarding the method use for electrocatalysis studies.