2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better understanding of academic, cognitive, and behavioral profiles of students with RD can enhance the alignment of instructional components to learning needs and support the decision-making process to better predict for whom, and under what conditions, an adequate response to instruction occurs (e.g., Hoover & Tunmer, 2018). This alignment of instruction to the learner (i.e., for whom and under what conditions) is supported through research on decoding, fluency, and reading comprehension outcomes (e.g., Capin et al, 2022; Connor, Morrison, & Katch, 2004; Connor, Morrison, & Petrella, 2004; Connor et al, 2007; McMaster et al, 2012; Szadokierski et al, 2017). In Connor, Morrison, and Katch (2004) and Connor et al (2006), the authors found that for students with lower initial decoding skills, more instructional time spent on explicit instruction in decoding (rather than meaning-based instruction) led to larger decoding skills gains, as compared to students with higher pretest decoding skills who made larger decoding skills gains with more instructional time spent on meaning-based instruction (rather than explicit instruction in decoding).…”
Section: Latent Profiles Of Students With Rdsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A better understanding of academic, cognitive, and behavioral profiles of students with RD can enhance the alignment of instructional components to learning needs and support the decision-making process to better predict for whom, and under what conditions, an adequate response to instruction occurs (e.g., Hoover & Tunmer, 2018). This alignment of instruction to the learner (i.e., for whom and under what conditions) is supported through research on decoding, fluency, and reading comprehension outcomes (e.g., Capin et al, 2022; Connor, Morrison, & Katch, 2004; Connor, Morrison, & Petrella, 2004; Connor et al, 2007; McMaster et al, 2012; Szadokierski et al, 2017). In Connor, Morrison, and Katch (2004) and Connor et al (2006), the authors found that for students with lower initial decoding skills, more instructional time spent on explicit instruction in decoding (rather than meaning-based instruction) led to larger decoding skills gains, as compared to students with higher pretest decoding skills who made larger decoding skills gains with more instructional time spent on meaning-based instruction (rather than explicit instruction in decoding).…”
Section: Latent Profiles Of Students With Rdsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To further support the alignment of instructional components to learner needs, there is also promise in exploring students with RDs profile of academic, cognitive, and behavioral characteristics, and how these characteristics are associated with response to instruction (Capin et al, 2021(Capin et al, , 2022Cho et al, 2015;Miciak et al, 2014;Morris et al, 1998). Similar to studies using only reading pretest scores (e.g., Connor et al, 2007;McMaster et al, 2012;Szadokierski et al, 2017), if for example, a given academic, cognitive, and behavioral profile(s) is found to adequately respond to instruction, such findings can be used to support the efficacy of a given intervention for a sample of students under the given condition.…”
Section: Latent Profiles Of Students With Rdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dyslexia is diagnosed by tests that include reading and writing assessments, among other evaluations, and are standardized by experts on a large number of subjects [10,11]. The advancement of technology has made the digitalization of these tests possible, and it has also contributed to the objectivity of the testing as certain quantifiable metrics can be obtained from digitalized dyslexia tests [12][13][14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tong, Deng, and Tong (2022) study revealed that weakness in syntactic awareness in led to poor comprehension among Chinese learners either in their first language or in English second language. In investigating reading comprehension difficulties Capin et al (2022) reached the conclusion that word reading difficulties in grades 1-4 was the main reason. While Hall et al (2020) mentioned that inference is the main reason that led to reading comprehension difficulties among 6 th and 7 th grade students and inference instruction led to higher performance among 39 participants.…”
Section: Reading Comprehension Difficultiesmentioning
confidence: 99%