Understanding the Nature of Metadata: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background Metadata are created to describe the corresponding data in a detailed and unambiguous way and is used for various applications in different research areas, for example, data identification and classification. However, a clear definition of metadata is crucial for further use. Unfortunately, extensive experience with the processing and management of metadata has shown that the term “metadata” and its use is not always unambiguous. Objective This study aimed to understand the definition of metadata and the challenges resulting from metadata reuse. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in this study following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for reporting on systematic reviews. Five research questions were identified to streamline the review process, addressing metadata characteristics, metadata standards, use cases, and problems encountered. This review was preceded by a harmonization process to achieve a general understanding of the terms used. Results The harmonization process resulted in a clear set of definitions for metadata processing focusing on data integration. The following literature review was conducted by 10 reviewers with different backgrounds and using the harmonized definitions. This study included 81 peer-reviewed papers from the last decade after applying various filtering steps to identify the most relevant papers. The 5 research questions could be answered, resulting in a broad overview of the standards, use cases, problems, and corresponding solutions for the application of metadata in different research areas. Conclusions Metadata can be a powerful tool for identifying, describing, and processing information, but its meaningful creation is costly and challenging. This review process uncovered many standards, use cases, problems, and solutions for dealing with metadata. The presented harmonized definitions and the new schema have the potential to improve the classification and generation of metadata by creating a shared understanding of metadata and its context.

Metadata integrity in bioinformatics: Bridging the gap between data and knowledge

“…However, even in 2022, the term “metadata” is not clearly defined, instead a variety of definitions, standards, contexts and formats exists [24] . In fact, according to Furner (2019), there are 96 separate ISO standards and 46 different definitions for the term “metadata” [25] .…”

DataPilot: Utilizing Quality and Usage Information for Subset Selection during Visual Data Preparation

“…With the proliferation of big data, more data [24] and metadata [113] (e.g., application logs) are being stored and processed. In database contexts, "data provenance" is used to reason about the current state of a data object [127], e.g., describe its provenance characteristics ("Data Descriptors" [101]), study secure provenance schemes and associated issues (Zafar et al [127]), and document the purpose, performance, safety, and security of data and models ("Fact-Sheets" [9]) and computational workflows (Wings/Pegasus [63]).…”

From Planning Stage To FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists

“…1A), from planning to its final storage alongside publication. [2][3][4][5][6] . There is a growing consensus among researchers, journals and funding agencies that data should adhere to the principles of being findable, accessible, inter-operable and reusable (FAIR).…”