Understanding the processes behind the decisions – GPs and complex multimorbidity decision making

Abstract

Complex multimorbidity, defined either as three or more chronic conditions affecting three or more different body systems or by the patients General Practitioner (GPs), is associated with various adverse outcomes. Understanding how GPs reach decisions for this complex group of patients is currently under-researched, with potential implications for health systems and service delivery. Schuttner and colleagues, through a qualitative approach, reported that internal factors of individuals (decisions tailored to patients; Primary Care Physician (PCP) consultation style; care planning towards an agreed goal of care), external factors within the environment or context of encounter (patient access to healthcare; organizational structures acting as barriers), and relationship-based factors (collaborative care planning; decisions within a dynamic patient clinician relationship) all influence care planning decisions. There are other important findings which have broader relevance to the literature such as the ongoing separation of physical and mental health which persist even within integrated care systems, GPs continue to prioritize continuity of care and that organizational barriers are reported as factors in clinician decision-making for patients. More broadly, the work has proved valuable in extending previously reported findings surrounding care coordination, and limitation of current guidelines for patients with complex multimorbidity. Work-load in general practice is increasing due to an ageing population, increasing prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, and transfer of clinical activities from secondary to primary care. The future for GPs is more complexity in the clinic room, understanding how GPs make decisions and how this can be supported is crucial for the sustainability for general practice.

The memory clinic and psychosocial intervention: Translating past promise into current practices

“…GP workloads have increased with low numbers of GPs per head of population in some localities. Whist GP continuity can have good medical outcomes ( 49 ) decision-making for complex multi-morbidity in ageing populations is not easy, particularly where communication gaps persist between them and specialist physicians ( 56 , 57 ). Additionally, weak organisational systems can undermine collaboration ( 58 ) and case management in primary care has huge challenges ( 59 ).…”

State of the art: A roadmap for the national echocardiography team 2023

“…Communities of practice also enhance clinical practice and can be used to share the burden of decision making, which is particularly high in general practice. 27 Effective triage of all incoming departmental requests has been shown to reduce waiting lists from 12–13 weeks down to 6 weeks over 6 months. 28 Senior triage roles should be developed that build on the established success of triaging by adding a layer of communication between senior triagers (Responsible Clinicians) and requestors, creating a stronger community of practice.…”

Education of clinical reasoning in patients with multimorbidity: a scoping review and perspectives for technology-enhanced learning

“…A systematic review in 2015 (Bogetz et al, 2015) identified 22 articles on educational interventions on chronic care, but most of them were on a single chronic condition and the studies did not consider clinical reasoning but rather focused the knowledge of the health care delivery system, the development of management and inter-disciplinary teamwork skill, or attitudes of students and residents toward chronic care. According to the same situational approach as Schaye et al (2023), a recent study (Hughes, 2022) investigated the general practitioners' reasoning process when managing patients with multimorbidity, identifying internal, external, and relationship-based elements.…”