Rendering a common ligand scaffold anionic and then pairing
it
with a chiral cation represents an alternative strategy for developing
enantioselective versions of challenging transformations, as has been
recently demonstrated in the enantioselective borylation of arenes
using a quinine-derived chiral cation. A significant barrier to the
further generalization of this approach is the lack of understanding
of the specific interactions involved between the cation, ligand,
and substrate, given the complexity of the system. We have embarked
on a detailed computational study probing the mechanism, the key noncovalent
interactions involved, and potential origin of selectivity for the
desymmetrizing borylation of two distinct classes of substrate. We
describe a deconstructive, stepwise approach to tackling this complex
challenge, which involves building up a detailed understanding of
the pairwise components of the nominally three component system before
combining together into the full 263-atom reactive complex. This approach
has revealed substantial differences in the noncovalent interactions
occurring at the stereodetermining transition state for C–H
oxidative addition to iridium for the two substrate classes. Each
substrate engages in a unique mixture of diverse interactions, a testament
to the rich and privileged structure of the cinchona alkaloid-derived
chiral cations. Throughout the study, experimental support is provided,
and this culminates in the discovery that prochiral phosphine oxide
substrates, lacking hydrogen bond donor functionality, can also give
very encouraging levels of enantioselectivity, potentially through
direct interactions with the chiral cation. We envisage that the findings
in this study will spur further developments in using chiral cations
as controllers in asymmetric transition-metal catalysis.