2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

56
682
0
51

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,479 publications
(875 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
56
682
0
51
Order By: Relevance
“…5 clearly demon strate an increase in their number (identified by white arrows) when the WG content rises, suggesting a lower degree of the geopolymeric reaction and, therefore, a worse mechanical perfor mance. Similar findings have been reported for WG containing geopolymers (Hao et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2012), and for MK based geopolymers which were produced with distinct Si/Al ratios (Duxson et al, 2005). Khale and Chaudhary (2007) suggested that the Si/Al ratio must lie between 3.3 and 4.5 in order to form strong geopolymeric prod ucts.…”
Section: Geopolymers Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…5 clearly demon strate an increase in their number (identified by white arrows) when the WG content rises, suggesting a lower degree of the geopolymeric reaction and, therefore, a worse mechanical perfor mance. Similar findings have been reported for WG containing geopolymers (Hao et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2012), and for MK based geopolymers which were produced with distinct Si/Al ratios (Duxson et al, 2005). Khale and Chaudhary (2007) suggested that the Si/Al ratio must lie between 3.3 and 4.5 in order to form strong geopolymeric prod ucts.…”
Section: Geopolymers Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The presence of anhydrous silicates in both spectra (signal at −72 ppm) supported the premise that C-S-H gel was not the only binder forming in systems C and D. The gel did, however, form part of both binders, since some of the clinker disappeared (was hydrated) in these systems: note the difference in the signal at −72 ppm between spectra B and C on the one hand and spectrum A on the other. The presence of low intensity signals at −90, −95 and −102 ppm in spectra C and D was also significant, since in prior studies (37,40,81,87,88) these signals were associated with N-A-S-H gel and attributed to Q 4 units with 3, 2 or 1 aluminium atoms.…”
Section: Co-precipitation Of Cementitious Gels: C-s-h + N-a-s-hmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Studies conducted by a number of authors (84)(85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94) showed that both the curing temperature and type of activator impact reaction kinetics, with the degree of reaction rising with curing temperature. In addition, the nature of the products generated (N-A-S-H gel-like and zeolite precipitates) in of aluminosilicate activation varies with curing time and temperature.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Alkaline Activation In Lowcalcium Systems:[(mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with the results obtained through high temperature in-situ measurements [34,35,37], this can be divided into three sub-regions: in region I (100-300°C), a large shrinkage occurs mainly due to pore water and region III (600-800°C), which shows a large shrinkage to a 'sintering point' and then sometimes expansion. The temperature of the sintering point is affected by many factors, such as the solid materials, the calcium content, and the molar ratio of SiO2/Na2O used in the activator, which effectively defines geopolymer microstructure [42]. For example, the sintering point seems not to appear before 900°C if metakaolin is used as the raw material, and the samples are cured to maturity [31,43].…”
Section: Thermal Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%