2020
DOI: 10.1108/ecam-09-2019-0508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the risk factors of BIM technology implementation in the construction industry: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify risk factors in building information modeling (BIM) technology application, analyze the correlation between risk factors, and find the most influential risk factors using interpretative structural model (ISM), put forward a response to targeted suggestions, and provide a reference for widespread BIM technology application.Design/methodology/approachLiterature reviews, ISM, a questionnaire survey and expert interviews were used in this paper. First, the risk facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Sun et al [104] has applied ISM to analyze the risk factors of Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology implementation in the construction industry. In addition, identification of food safety risk factors was carried out by Zhang and Song [105]. In another study, analyzing the risk factors of public and private partnership (PPP) project in India [106].…”
Section: Ism Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sun et al [104] has applied ISM to analyze the risk factors of Building Information Modelling (BIM) technology implementation in the construction industry. In addition, identification of food safety risk factors was carried out by Zhang and Song [105]. In another study, analyzing the risk factors of public and private partnership (PPP) project in India [106].…”
Section: Ism Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inconsistent attitudes for BIM roles would hinder collaboration. Thirdly, ambiguous model ownerships together with unclear responsibility for maintaining BIM models would expose collaboration to conflicts (Sun et al , 2020). Partners failing to reach an agreement on the model ownerships resulted in mistrust, which would destroy the willingness to share comprehensive BIM models (Liu et al , 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to traditional construction projects, BECPs experience serious collaboration dynamics due to the participation of more partners with intensive communications and interactions (Lu et al , 2020). Moreover, collaboration in BECPs also suffers from specific risks and barriers, such as ambiguous model ownership, technology immaturity, and lack of BIM competences, which may further sophisticate collaboration (Oraee et al , 2019; Sun et al , 2020). Therefore, BECPs may encounter diversified collaboration conditions with different collaboration levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e current experience of integrating BIM into the EPC project management process is less, and also the application system has not kept up with the pace of development. e application level of BIM in EPC projects not only depends on the project teams' technology, financial, organization, management issues, and related legal issues [13,[22][23][24], but also closely related to the attitudes of other participants towards BIM. ey cannot genuinely cooperate even if they jointly adopt BIM technology because various enterprises seek to maximize their own interests [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%