2004
DOI: 10.1080/0260293042000227254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheng & Warren (1997) proposed that in order to help students cultivate positive attitudes towards peer assessment, it was necessary to : a) provide comprehensive training to them, b) involve them in the discussion of establishing feedback criteria, c) come to a mutual agreement between teacher and students on the appropriate weightage of the final grade/mark, and d) instil a sense of awareness and responsibility in the group of students. Bloxham & West (2004) also explored how training provision for the assessment process might develop students' understanding of assessment criteria. Their findings revealed that students believed that the feedback criteria appeared to help them improve their performance and mark their peers' work more accurately.…”
Section: Recommendations By Previous Studies On Peer Assessment and Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng & Warren (1997) proposed that in order to help students cultivate positive attitudes towards peer assessment, it was necessary to : a) provide comprehensive training to them, b) involve them in the discussion of establishing feedback criteria, c) come to a mutual agreement between teacher and students on the appropriate weightage of the final grade/mark, and d) instil a sense of awareness and responsibility in the group of students. Bloxham & West (2004) also explored how training provision for the assessment process might develop students' understanding of assessment criteria. Their findings revealed that students believed that the feedback criteria appeared to help them improve their performance and mark their peers' work more accurately.…”
Section: Recommendations By Previous Studies On Peer Assessment and Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…regardless of purpose (i.e., accountability or improvement). Research into students' preferences for alternative assessments (such as portfolios, projects, self-assessment, peer-assessment, and other non-examination assessments) shows that the assessments that have been positively evaluated by students were more authentic and thus made learning more realistic or powerful (Andresen et al 1994;Slater 1996;Sambell et al 1997;Segers and Dochy 2001;Bloxham and West 2004). Slater (1996) found that some students thought that they would remember what they learned for longer because the work to produce a portfolio helped them internalise the material.…”
Section: Assessment Is Enjoyablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a seminal study led by Falchikov (1986), students involved in peer-assessment not only said it was challenging but also acknowledged the development of their own critical thinking skills. Another study conducted by Bloxham and West (2004) pointed out that peer-assessment not only supported independent learning but also developed a consciousness about the criteria used on the assessment process. However, there are also pitfalls of peer-assessment in terms of concerns regarding size of classes, accuracy and efficacy (Boud et al, 2014;Ng & Earl, 2008;Taylor, 2008).…”
Section: Self and Peer Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%