2022
DOI: 10.2196/39571
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Social Mechanism of Cancer Misinformation Spread on YouTube and Lessons Learned: Infodemiological Study

Abstract: Background A knowledge gap exists between the list of required actions and the action plan for countering cancer misinformation on social media. Little attention has been paid to a social media strategy for disseminating factual information while also disrupting misinformation on social media networks. Objective The aim of this study was to, first, identify the spread structure of cancer misinformation on YouTube. We asked the question, “How do YouTube … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 3 categories were chosen for comparison, as while a significant portion of urological conditions is benign in nature, all 3 categories encompass pathologies commonly seen by urologists, and the implications of access to information about them on patient outcomes differ. 12 For example, cancer misinformation could potentially impact the survival rate for cancer patients, 13 and online health information often changes patients’ decisions to seek emergency care. 14 Each patient question was inputted into a new ChatGPT chat box by one of us (RD) consecutively on February 28, 2023, and the first outputs generated were recorded for analysis (Supplemental Table 1, https://www.jurology.com).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 3 categories were chosen for comparison, as while a significant portion of urological conditions is benign in nature, all 3 categories encompass pathologies commonly seen by urologists, and the implications of access to information about them on patient outcomes differ. 12 For example, cancer misinformation could potentially impact the survival rate for cancer patients, 13 and online health information often changes patients’ decisions to seek emergency care. 14 Each patient question was inputted into a new ChatGPT chat box by one of us (RD) consecutively on February 28, 2023, and the first outputs generated were recorded for analysis (Supplemental Table 1, https://www.jurology.com).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…YouTube's recommendations may be the most vital part of the misinformation, as many studies found that videos containing misinformation were easily recommended and that 70% of the viewership came from recommendations [51]. Yoon et al [52] reviewed videos with a 9-day crowd-sourced audit that suggested fenbendazole could cure cancer, and they found that the information was spread via both human and algorithm recommendations.…”
Section: Review Of Misinformation Analysis On Youtubementioning
confidence: 99%
“…YouTube's recommendations may be the most vital part of the misinformation, as many studies found that videos containing misinformation were easily recommended and that 70% of the viewership came from recommendations [51]. Yoon et al [52] reviewed videos with a 9-day crowd-sourced audit that suggested fenbendazole could cure cancer, and they found that the information was spread via both human and algorithm recommendations.…”
Section: Review Of Misinformation Analysis On Youtubementioning
confidence: 99%