2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the solid-state forms of fenofibrate – A spectroscopic and computational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
81
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The melting points of the FNT formulations were very similar, and the value was approximately 80 C, which matched to the melting point of the crystalline FNT form I reported by Heinz et al (2009), demonstrating that crystalline FNT form I were existed in the FNT formulations.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The melting points of the FNT formulations were very similar, and the value was approximately 80 C, which matched to the melting point of the crystalline FNT form I reported by Heinz et al (2009), demonstrating that crystalline FNT form I were existed in the FNT formulations.…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Loadings and (c) scores plots generated by principal component analysis from the Raman spectra obtained upon heating amorphous fenofibrate between -180 and 90 C. Loadings are offset for clarity. Reprinted from Heinz et al [145] with permission from Elsevier.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ FTIR and Raman microscopy Carbamazepine [144] Solid-solid recrystallisation of amorphous carbamazepine to carbamazepine form III Heating In-situ TPS Fenofibrate [145] Solid-solid recrystallisation of amorphous fenofibrate via metastable form II to form I Heating In-situ Raman spectroscopy Carbamazepine, indometacin [146] Solution-mediated recrystallisation of amorphous indometacin and carbamazepine …”
Section: Different Relative Humiditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fenofibrate was characterized by a single sharp melting endothermic peak at 81.5°C (∆H = 80.57 J/g) during differential scanning calorimetry analysis, and various diffraction peaks due to the fenofibrate crystalline (form I) structure were observed at 12°, 14.5°, 16.2°, 16.8°, and 22.4° in the PXRD analysis, which corresponds to the known melting endothermic peak and powder diffraction patterns for pure fenofibrate. 24,25 In the case of Neusilin UFL2, neither an endothermic peak of differential scanning calorimetry nor diffraction peaks from PXRD patterns were observed because of its amorphous structure. Table 3 and Figure 4 illustrate decreasing crystallinity corresponding to an increasing Neusilin UFL2 ratio and the change to the amorphous form in the case of SC3 and SC4.…”
Section: Crystallinity Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%