2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the sources of normative influence on behavior: The example of tobacco

Abstract: Despite extensive research on social norms, the sources of norm formation are not well understood. Social exposure to a behavior (defined as the composite of ways through which people see that behavior in their social, physical, and symbolic environments) can serve as a source of normative influence. Using tobacco as a case study, we propose that research should move beyond categories of individuals as sources of norms and focus on a broader range of sources of normative influences. An understanding of social … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mead and colleagues 29 have argued that smoking social norms are shaped not only by normative influences in the social environment, but also those in the physical and symbolic environments. In the students’ accounts in the focus groups we found evidence of both effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mead and colleagues 29 have argued that smoking social norms are shaped not only by normative influences in the social environment, but also those in the physical and symbolic environments. In the students’ accounts in the focus groups we found evidence of both effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we measured MPFC activity in smokers as they viewed messages that varied in the presence or absence of three key features known to affect health decisions and behavior change: portrayal of risk/negative consequences (Peters, Ruiter, & Kok, 2012; Kim Witte & Allen, 2000); portrayal of social norms/consequences (Cialdini et al, 2006; Mead et al, 2014) and portrayal of health outcomes/consequences (Hammond, 2011) (See section 2.2.1 and Figure 1 for examples). We focused our analyses on a subregion of MPFC involved in self-related processing (hereafter: self-MPFC ).…”
Section: - Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Consequently, selective information exposure and transmission processes may allow social media users to establish an information filter ‘bubble’ in which tobacco use is portrayed as a normal acceptable behaviour and becomes part of shared, in-group experience 31. Thus, tobacco-related messages on social media may lead to tobacco use initiation through such mechanisms as social learning or modelling of behaviours32 and socialisation into peer groups 33–37. Indeed, portrayal of tobacco and alcohol misuse is becoming a common activity to network about on Twitter 25…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Thus, tobacco-related messages on social media may lead to tobacco use initiation through such mechanisms as social learning or modelling of behaviours 32 and socialisation into peer groups. [33][34][35][36][37] Indeed, portrayal of tobacco and alcohol misuse is becoming a common activity to network about on Twitter. 25 29 38 39 In addition to product promotion, social-networking sites are also used by the tobacco industry and their allies to influence public opinion on tobacco control policy decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%