2017
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.04117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Why, What, and How of Theories in IS Research

Abstract: Theory's pivotal importance has been emphasized in the information systems (IS) discipline since its inception. As in many fields of science, IS scholars' ability to understand and contribute to theory is an important qualification in research practice. This requires solid foundations for why we engage with theory, what theory is for us, and how we work with theory. We synthesize and reflect on the debates on theories and theorizing in the IS field. Our key contribution is to inform (new) authors of the prevai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
(277 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of research is referred to as the “extracting case study” approach and has produced valuable contributions such as the Kanban‐system applied in continuous process improvement (Gregor, ; van Aken, ). Mueller and Urbach () refer to five types of reasoning: inductive, deductive, abductive, retroductive, and theorizing through design and action. This research uses the latter reasoning, which involves reflecting on what has been done and the abstracting of design principles, which produces theory for design and action (Gregor, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of research is referred to as the “extracting case study” approach and has produced valuable contributions such as the Kanban‐system applied in continuous process improvement (Gregor, ; van Aken, ). Mueller and Urbach () refer to five types of reasoning: inductive, deductive, abductive, retroductive, and theorizing through design and action. This research uses the latter reasoning, which involves reflecting on what has been done and the abstracting of design principles, which produces theory for design and action (Gregor, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of the latter study was limited to the concepts and applications of crowdsourcing, and called for scholars to further study the crowdsourcing context from participant, firm, and system perspectives. Given the importance of theories in the information systems (IS) research (Mueller and Urbach, 2017), we also looked at the distribution of theories used in the selected papers ( Figure 4). We found that 36 of the 54 studies (67%) drew on 25 theories to provide a theoretical basis to explain, describe, or predict their corresponding research questions ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Primary Study Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the conceptual research model shown in Figure 3, we conducted a study to investigate the extent to which different green IT measures can increase the sustainability of ERP systems. This research builds on an inductive approach [80] which involves exploring the behaviors of companies in order to generate a hypothesis. Using inductive reasoning, we made specific observations related to the relationship between green IT initiatives and ERP systems.…”
Section: Research Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, to record the level of awareness about green ERP system criteria and green IT practices, different categories of items were defined (i.e., awareness about software sustainability, awareness about sustainable management process, and awareness about green IT initiatives and practices). To collect This research builds on an inductive approach [80] which involves exploring the behaviors of companies in order to generate a hypothesis. Using inductive reasoning, we made specific observations related to the relationship between green IT initiatives and ERP systems.…”
Section: Research Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%